summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/60/186b18356429f7ff158a7d5726e504fe3009d6
blob: d633bbffaae73566083f3629db4a2330749f3f55 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>) id 1Sqrgl-0004gQ-IJ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:14:39 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.213.175;
	envelope-from=thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-yx0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Sqrgk-0000gZ-VH
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:14:39 +0000
Received: by yenl13 with SMTP id l13so5650539yen.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.73.98 with SMTP id k2mr24998285pav.73.1342469673166; Mon,
	16 Jul 2012 13:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.215.6 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D55C3D18-8286-44E9-B877-6FCE7C05E980@ceptacle.com>
References: <D55C3D18-8286-44E9-B877-6FCE7C05E980@ceptacle.com>
From: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?TWFydGlueCAtIBskQiU4JSchPCVgJTobKEI=?=
	<thiagocmartinsc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:14:02 -0300
Message-ID: <CAJSM8J1pTh4WdkZWB9tK-z6rpTr7auhY-2SBuq+9xW1gkowBGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=F8nager?= <gronager@ceptacle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042f9e58fda9b904c4f8131e
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(thiagocmartinsc[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Sqrgk-0000gZ-VH
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Announcement: libcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 20:14:39 -0000

--f46d042f9e58fda9b904c4f8131e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Michael!

 I would like to ask you one thing:

 1- Release a new version of Libcoin closest as possible with mainline
Bitcoin.

 I mean, do not add any extra code to it and also, do not change any stdout
/ stderr messages.

 How much do you think that this will cost?

 For the extra code: I'll need to run the "blockchain side" as Linux user
called "blockchain" and, each of my regular Linux user will have its own
wallet.dat file (without the blockchain).

Thanks!
Thiago

--f46d042f9e58fda9b904c4f8131e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Michael!<div><br></div><div>=A0I would like to ask you one thing:</div><=
div><br></div><div>=A01- Release a new version of Libcoin closest as possib=
le with mainline Bitcoin.</div><div><br></div><div>=A0I mean, do not add an=
y extra code to it and also, do not change any stdout / stderr messages.</d=
iv>

<div><br></div><div>=A0How much do you think that this will cost?</div><div=
><br></div><div>=A0For the extra code: I&#39;ll need to run the &quot;block=
chain side&quot; as Linux user called &quot;blockchain&quot; and, each of m=
y regular Linux user will have its own wallet.dat file (without the blockch=
ain).</div>

<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div>Thiago</div>

--f46d042f9e58fda9b904c4f8131e--