summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/5e/3d710708dc5664262e13df92fc70b7bd166b69
blob: e0c3e7db28501c8b48bdc4be7ded06f9590d1b8a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1RayEn-0006kH-7d
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:27:49 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1RayEm-0005yr-7h for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:27:49 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
	[184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1EF0560534;
	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:27:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:27:34 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.4-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <1323731781.42953.YahooMailClassic@web120920.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CAGQP0AE7Pd5HLmTizJVzdBLXx+mR2NwJPM6eMfUf8i=4DFL76g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ1JLttapMPTp0KE=V6Y5DFonvp5-dYK7KS6MoqUL8O1kt1stg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1JLttapMPTp0KE=V6Y5DFonvp5-dYK7KS6MoqUL8O1kt1stg@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201112141827.36100.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RayEm-0005yr-7h
Cc: Jorge
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: [BIP 15] Aliases
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:27:49 -0000

On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:02:25 PM Rick Wesson wrote:
> I also am largely in favor of using secured zones to publish TXT
> records to digital currencies. I've been thinking mainly about TXT
> using the following format for bitcoin.
> 
> _btc.<lhs>.<rhs>

Don't confuse BTC (Bitcoin unit) with BC (Bitcoin in general / protocol)...
The hard part of using DNS will be sticking to the standard good practice of 
using a new address for every transaction.