1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
|
Return-Path: <namanhd@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DA0C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 9 Jul 2022 17:41:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB18042164
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 9 Jul 2022 17:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org EB18042164
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=RcyYMItN
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id c9qCp2bI8zzK
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 9 Jul 2022 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 72E7D41BE8
Received: from mail-yw1-x112b.google.com (mail-yw1-x112b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112b])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72E7D41BE8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 9 Jul 2022 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw1-x112b.google.com with SMTP id
00721157ae682-31c89653790so14272357b3.13
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 09 Jul 2022 10:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=4PAq4ft8W9ulTt953o4sTSC91PTJbs44R/CiCj3mE4c=;
b=RcyYMItNRSKL1rcyt+rchjeHMbJ66nXDmc6n4uYAL7G6RhdCaCVLuUKqKs4ZQACbcR
FXsfpkxY950lR95h0FtsvFJctLACPLcpaCsdiMHB+cDoS84UfDvR06kshFmRiaeAJsx5
I1BeI+WxsW9dMLjflSlM85sTu70LRvlxjP5ECej/hOcRAu/Bg+dl6Wtfuyf2P8qMDdYI
0anxGe8HXdZUCB49MSRsQpafUk/IMp9fR3DuEGafS4tFGFKjaVRwwwgav87aa4/oXSt1
eWJ19/9tHnW5zENTMITtKGyK7UZJwD23z4VY0MWkY0297lwXIQvEuZP9+AB0kiCJH/MA
wXkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=4PAq4ft8W9ulTt953o4sTSC91PTJbs44R/CiCj3mE4c=;
b=gsQeh04bTmXjWGEXl8EldjaMezfg6v2qLNRa+7W6An/M8RZeG2mmI7rDvO9TVYe7Cw
iUNdQmJ3w98++pyLYVvQrrXbVih7U24HTkx0cl5tFY5Dc8f+Lb207KxIp6QcIe2JZfJi
VMwCTtAYhmgcx8h5eOLe4sYCUvssB/nyO8mrMS2FLMFcEsnp7kshdk89zIpoLThnx0Gq
qDK+JqktpUUE0kmNv/q4uxAxGgnc+2PpU2ZGZ++bXajbyOsH773h4BO3UufNVqL5QwgY
cbDfwxxxjKhTE/JOgrJ40sp8cWOuM+jrmLOkqjXM9p/+dOnYufCh4ZanP505sodycQu/
Nc9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8ctwmTBhWi5LViJJ3/r9gndXh4hR5KKZ53FfORGhmZF9O2A4jN
JnU6k67wPy1g685j/PTIgzhxTROuVJNoioUTcaTWPAo8KK8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tC15+i8Yb0e5ED01506RPc0q02asFX2Gn3A5aHhxTMcEzoRlgBY1vWdKS47V8W/DcRpJ7zLVTYAOHgpmvCdzA=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d001:0:b0:31c:75bc:25bd with SMTP id
s1-20020a0dd001000000b0031c75bc25bdmr10741122ywd.505.1657388485259; Sat, 09
Jul 2022 10:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <YsmbdMlt/KnvRs3U@petertodd.org>
<D7C30506-A95D-4B43-A1BA-37F13DAD5C6F@voskuil.org>
<YsmfTubgqua0FHR0@petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <YsmfTubgqua0FHR0@petertodd.org>
From: naman naman <namanhd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 21:43:49 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+SxJWAyKg-Hc4cYOkMrzXqer5jEbNcJ2f04BWfbyQ78bysZXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb38d205e362d313"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 17:47:57 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 17:41:28 -0000
--000000000000eb38d205e362d313
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi,
This approach raises the obvious question : If someone hasn't had access to
their coins in a long time (yrs, decades, however you want to define it) -
and they wish to access/move them after such a time - isn't your proposal
simply taking away their ability to do so? Some might call it : stealing
their coins.
How does one conclusively prove that "lost" coins are "lost forever"?
Regards,
thenoblebot
On Sat, 9 Jul, 2022, 7:31 pm Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev, <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 08:24:51AM -0700, Eric Voskuil wrote:
> > To clarify, price inflation is not caused by market production.
> Attributing the observed lack of inflation (eg fee %) to loss is an assumed
> relation.
>
> My article is a mathematical proof that has nothing to do with
> observations of
> inflation.
>
> What I did is prove that if there is tail emission/fixed supply, the coin
> supply will converge towards a fixed amount because the coin supply
> dependant
> rate of coin loss balances out the fixed rate of coin production.
>
> That proof has nothing to do with market dynamics and would happen in any
> system, economic or not, with similar underlying dynamics.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--000000000000eb38d205e362d313
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">Hi,=C2=A0<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Th=
is approach raises the obvious=C2=A0question : If someone hasn't had ac=
cess to their coins in a=C2=A0long time (yrs, decades, however you want to =
define it) - and they wish to access/move them after such a time - isn'=
t your proposal simply taking away their ability to do so? Some might call =
it : stealing their coins.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">How=
does one conclusively prove that "lost" coins are "lost for=
ever"?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Regards,=C2=
=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto">thenoblebot</div></div></div><br><div class=3D"g=
mail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, 9 Jul, 2022, 7:31=
pm Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev, <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.lin=
uxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">bitcoin-dev@lists.li=
nuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On=
Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 08:24:51AM -0700, Eric Voskuil wrote:<br>
> To clarify, price inflation is not caused by market production. Attrib=
uting the observed lack of inflation (eg fee %) to loss is an assumed relat=
ion.<br>
<br>
My article is a mathematical proof that has nothing to do with observations=
of<br>
inflation.<br>
<br>
What I did is prove that if there is tail emission/fixed supply, the coin<b=
r>
supply will converge towards a fixed amount because the coin supply dependa=
nt<br>
rate of coin loss balances out the fixed rate of coin production.<br>
<br>
That proof has nothing to do with market dynamics and would happen in any<b=
r>
system, economic or not, with similar underlying dynamics.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href=3D"https://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" =
target=3D"_blank">https://petertodd.org</a> 'peter'[:-1]@<a href=3D=
"http://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_=
blank">petertodd.org</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" rel=3D"noreferrer =
noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.li=
nuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000eb38d205e362d313--
|
