1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
|
Return-Path: <ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03EA297A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:14:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com (mail-lf0-f53.google.com
[209.85.215.53])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD503527
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:14:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a2so14658403lfh.11
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 05:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=SvNNSctPJDpJspRMIDwY1OY2pZC6c511glVFg8+Gnq8=;
b=M1c0cjHeA34z7obRiYN+Ga7JoHMw9IinuN/eRO6tiVYzmPrAMkEt1/yjqlcAqVfX5M
QCMl0cb/DGsOoheoyVDmnlW2uI8SrxoQ/afa/YOUz1sGrl0195HNC0bvEgVwaLL0Cnd5
bNjPATlD2hD2xP5PYyVJJ0M6QVv7YdifdaxuVPNO0ba05jZHa2NQH9sXVatRo+gGuASG
SEdNU/PnRN+YPeq4wTuBi+lOKE4vVb7UsT3g6aTge4nKCTWWqo25qOvl2cqWtvV2wGwp
UQoXdds/r/zqp/pgnBKlUcJF+1ftXYHPLjgD9lB7Mqozhk1bXfXtBQbj0tp4U4i//j7z
IxDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=SvNNSctPJDpJspRMIDwY1OY2pZC6c511glVFg8+Gnq8=;
b=TBjRv9q9gHcVfvZupOuN/ZKFHEs5Lf16EN/HLTEs452jOgH4wCG0HWKwTnSE+CWmqs
5PApT3KMHFcHV8fSSmXjjAl7v+Yfob9C+eVqNBXDf+NE+skMyyP0Fev+Il9LMmwMn2av
K2jCG5z2aiiaCRSFhgr7o34YiCMThVGfTrDMFzLXeWcrlNEgid0yZo3gSRjrgHQHdgWt
xolxBXVrKJq3EyONr76EmwT9xHl9ibeZJzlk70UGU8qa2kmrIizU2f7o1gxayeTWG6j4
a8P6IcA4F+Ynl+bswF9SrwGE9RU7AcxcoaglKTpvD8xxOX2iTu3W4RFr7BZrx89+RRwv
YQCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUQ8vgBny9O16JCzKqcdcFLnTqXYSws7rfbgh/uzKTuRW9Q8ALE
GtDNHljt1cF+r0c7ncN4iliKL0KyqWEEuBZxBIT8Fw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QCWhLqVDLV87LYXQ5qQAzL6i5EwiMvpJNuANw3l7t+CJqGnbBeAfxmLwrKBwidakCG9bPj+hnZYYJvZBTKz8k=
X-Received: by 10.25.233.81 with SMTP id g78mr3117024lfh.197.1509365683075;
Mon, 30 Oct 2017 05:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.146.25 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 05:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABuOfujV1gAaSOKBB7S0_JKuwp+3iNhY5kN59F3LLndPENUA_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABuOfujV1gAaSOKBB7S0_JKuwp+3iNhY5kN59F3LLndPENUA_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ricardo Filipe <ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:14:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CALC81CMgpzdeiD=T3yQazn5eAT7Nym4-t1bwGh1TD7rfuDT7EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: shiva sitamraju <shiva@blockonomics.co>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:18:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Visually Differentiable - Bitcoin Addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:14:46 -0000
start double checking the last few bytes instead?
2017-10-30 8:56 GMT+00:00 shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:
> Hi,
>
> When I copy and paste bitcoin address, I double check the first few bytes,
> to make sure I copied the correct one. This is to make sure some rogue
> software is not changing the address, or I incorrectly pasted the wrong
> address.
>
>
> With Bech32 address, its seems like in this department we are taking as step
> in the backward direction. With the traditional address, I could compare
> first few bytes like 1Ko or 1L3. With bech32, bc1. is all I can see and
> compare which is likely to be same anyway. Note that most users will only
> compare the first few bytes only (since addresses themselves are very long
> and will overflow in a mobile text box).
>
> Is there anyway to make the Bech32 addresses format more visually distinct
> (atleast the first few bytes) ?
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
