summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/5d/3dbab6e1fb134918f82385ae79326d4765030d
blob: 279a044a1c733d8579b544942e5b83ba01ebdd70 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1UGafy-0002ab-TF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:52:26 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.217.173; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-lb0-f173.google.com; 
Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UGafx-0003GZ-To
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:52:26 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id gf7so3057803lbb.4
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.42.37 with SMTP id k5mr3120966lbl.49.1363377139127; Fri,
	15 Mar 2013 12:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.96.164 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D0FC8006-AF19-4E92-87B4-A4FE356D4577@benlabs.net>
References: <201303131256.30144.luke@dashjr.org>
	<201303132106.45334.andyparkins@gmail.com>
	<201303132114.04596.luke@dashjr.org>
	<20130313212243.GQ96148@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<CAAS2fgSLmjhMmmrxjKQ0KOX5EEM4=+Wwebuaw4NHE9LdtLSP6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130313213608.GR96148@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<51411744.6010908@gmail.com>
	<D0FC8006-AF19-4E92-87B4-A4FE356D4577@benlabs.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:52:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQ0uD46P9FdsgMJW8jx3Yb3r9i+LEX7xnAEp4LEaoY5Kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Lindner <ben@benlabs.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UGafx-0003GZ-To
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.1 ideas
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:52:27 -0000

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Benjamin Lindner <ben@benlabs.net> wrote:
> This. Software behavior which is not described by the source code should =
not be considered an integral part of the rule set.
> Any influence of external libraries on the consensus mechanism is unaccep=
table.

No one thinks its controversial to remove it or that it's a good thing
to have=E2=80=94 only that its technically somewhat complicated and risky t=
o
remove it.