1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1WHySh-0007af-SC
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:32:59 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.49; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-wg0-f49.google.com;
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WHySh-0006Kq-1U
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:32:59 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so4799660wgg.28
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:32:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=gjq6F780iyeT4rzb63JeRuLD8pU7tLI1j89eAZLqg0I=;
b=lKpUcXXwvsCJ0dRu5IV+PYy2bdrUYq9kM1IJe8NdOcr5S35khRwIRpEsbe6PKMGfuk
EGjRVzyCjLkOmf/zaIdCQ0j2z/BKxHRJCBQpxN3kbdXNhNNPXF0XW0hn6d39etKAtyOV
L/kzk3AzHeYSozQvl7uHMqxNx+98Wdi/UL1jAopyoyoFlHysRf9Co1euNdIAPVYBBjnL
vuEPuZZEnaTm8bxrfMemK9Gn73AbsCnp4Xsxfvs7fYCrmQSLABJs6t0EKpwE3Jc7dbeD
1Rj1CffOTFEaeUtbK+CLZaeqT65QhTiMcJ5SBt4sQ6pEiuf6wN2mHNJPp674OFE2q70t
gSgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntF0lFaNz34sZiONXxP9mqYiz/G1MtGbmA4WYEivc0ZrMYu93stYf3FrQHKoawI7HOVrvh
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.12.5 with SMTP id em5mr7201466wjd.77.1393259572608; Mon,
24 Feb 2014 08:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.82.197 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:32:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBi0ehdE4TszJGYNBcY0VNJtDNsOfOuaz+QpH9fBjr5z7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJHLa0PXHY1qisXhN98DMxgp11ouqkzYMBvrTTNOtwX09T1kZg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBi0ehdE4TszJGYNBcY0VNJtDNsOfOuaz+QpH9fBjr5z7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:32:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0Nwyfs_VJcGeSEgix5wb00LfpDGmdS4u378+XO8QKwiJA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WHySh-0006Kq-1U
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9 release
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:33:00 -0000
Not really -- a MasterCoin transaction or JPEG
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:
>
>> I do think
>> regular transactions should have the ability to include some metadata.
>
> and
>
>> 2) Endorsement of chain data storage.
>>
>> Nothing could be further from the truth.
>
> These two statements are in direct contradiction with each other.
>
> --
> Pieter
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
|
