summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/5b/a1e82d0b6ef7497fb827114e4933148d27281d
blob: 856f772f71425a250fe6e66fed35c3c6bbe13ebb (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1Z60R8-0003tL-7Z
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:50:42 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
	designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.181; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f181.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z60R7-0002oB-AT
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:50:42 +0000
Received: by obctg8 with SMTP id tg8so79207906obc.3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=MGRCL1ArlZbJktX3zYnDgUqYaQr4iqwYsELIYCvwVoQ=;
	b=Tc3ivZtB60yUxSRTwO5uF6B1uv97odwnjHnnVUVw8/eIN/2YNpcFtyzIJtW8S2uL98
	EeLeNcuihHc7+GyIGtbJu9pW5FRu0SUbHqRDak2E7rmQGZ5Rxlcz5om0IpKXtAtHwSd6
	K1d2OwJ7UHmcJm/hL+b02jkeMoYcJ/L56cQDKrWCCbGpxGbhJfLIH55558ZdtRelH4gu
	ypyMi44MXhFZYViwPlXP75dzpzbxjU8TbQifW+zKe/U56I/h9+wuE8YoG39px6hBVsLL
	X4p/KPR12KSIYyRU/KQBw83MftwSpjUG4yQYazBZfQ7dbZu6WVgt2ORL2ShX+f/lM1AI
	x00Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0yAptVrHEloJogDxykmbXp7/lXiA7Rp14YafPS+GeJAL+h5GoUm6tV97cgwbx+SCTvlsU
X-Received: by 10.202.55.7 with SMTP id e7mr13793181oia.56.1434736235899; Fri,
	19 Jun 2015 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.108.149 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ce3968063ee51172883eb88dcb7a9bba@riseup.net>
References: <20150619103959.GA32315@savin.petertodd.org>
	<04CE3756-B032-464C-8FBD-7ACDD1A3197D@gmail.com>
	<812d8353e66637ec182da31bc0a9aac1@riseup.net>
	<1727885.UUNByX4Jyd@crushinator>
	<15ea02cb53046dbe363d5d4876becb6d@riseup.net>
	<CAJHLa0PXrtVAo4g2HnqzU+nYK_Eo6waUvryZ9-pbDdvU5LOyNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<ce3968063ee51172883eb88dcb7a9bba@riseup.net>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:50:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0Ne9TxXwKRE0x2xoX9TUZV3WNPNbM3noXrDvFg-0zJ3vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113cea26b005f90518e28f8a
X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.2 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1Z60R7-0002oB-AT
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] F2Pool has enabled full replace-by-fee
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:50:42 -0000

--001a113cea26b005f90518e28f8a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:48 AM, <justusranvier@riseup.net> wrote:

> On 2015-06-19 17:40, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> Making multiple incompatible versions of a spend is a -requirement- of
>> various refund contract protocols.
>>
>
> Is there not a dedicated field in a transaction (nSequence) for express
> purpose of indicating when a protocol like this is in use?
>

No.  You cannot know which is the 'right' or wrong transaction.  One tx has
obvious nSequence adjustments, the other - the refund transaction - may not.

-- 
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/

--001a113cea26b005f90518e28f8a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:48 AM,  <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<=
a href=3D"mailto:justusranvier@riseup.net" target=3D"_blank">justusranvier@=
riseup.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On 2015-06=
-19 17:40, Jeff Garzik wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Making multiple incompatible versions of a spend is a -requirement- of<br>
various refund contract protocols.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Is there not a dedicated field in a transaction (nSequence) for express pur=
pose of indicating when a protocol like this is in use?<br></blockquote><di=
v><br></div><div>No.=C2=A0 You cannot know which is the &#39;right&#39; or =
wrong transaction.=C2=A0 One tx has obvious nSequence adjustments, the othe=
r - the refund transaction - may not.</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div=
 class=3D"gmail_signature">Jeff Garzik<br>Bitcoin core developer and open s=
ource evangelist<br>BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://bit=
pay.com/" target=3D"_blank">https://bitpay.com/</a></div>
</div></div>

--001a113cea26b005f90518e28f8a--