1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
|
Return-Path: <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAE6C002A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420D560701
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 420D560701
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=mv7Il+Bl
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id sK1UJxbYMxB0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4BD5F606C0
Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD5F606C0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id
n19-20020a05600c501300b003f064936c3eso9243845wmr.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 05:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681216049; x=1683808049;
h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:message-id:date
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=n1M226QNCGioXRNx5RE6RgdRZRue8PwkUR0DAEU6/cI=;
b=mv7Il+Blt4MHmvcyPcTaDNuZi3MIrpWQkntVIFnm46MGf6qZ8YwwQvtrWYi7VOb9/Q
L5xLn/HVOFd99vrGhqAhV1KVURYEXlyyN6wc5eJvb9cAJrQSEf0cd4OnrY5kP3OzT/ll
t+10hnIXWh+OY47tEqZ0/QWmAERo9imqjV4NlyMCsTIgP2jjLGjGPOX2IUI80XSpHyBv
oWxDG+RwQoyHkWTqtjd6C1epkDBjAWAYvb7O9dxn1ESnzCyeAxrlQ5I+cveR99zyAxZM
wTSscNju1s+RtRooiDJhzrVTXJNsPSAaKoQxCDdw0/Ko4tpQ/VGE8afOxF4Id8NM2ygn
We1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681216049; x=1683808049;
h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:message-id:date
:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to
:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=n1M226QNCGioXRNx5RE6RgdRZRue8PwkUR0DAEU6/cI=;
b=tx8jf/3HljzmHVq227P7Br1+Ar/w3+Jrc/N5nWh94L2bGnMSHov/zMAYPzMar5WzOA
4H10VAf66KEmm0BurAqeEIZEKYl6zDtd46Yso/SzjPaNsXpc9EzwArKUUOJa5d/4EZlR
/pHU0xRdIPjcAEfVDXpn8oifZ/j2kA2nG1JAnLsVTRjshx4pK5wo74seYNm55XbC/117
eRrzihodgxEBoCw/PQQu+DVIPTxqp3aiBrrraPRAnr+UrN13TpkdtULxx7Qo0DC6pFTI
zfUgcucqtM4WSQA3cpmMZd2hrdloUnfLGvcfs0tVEpq5je7LA3KJ2vMjvVFnS/tmhZIj
WE2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f5oPpQQuWAmQb7cc5VwXKhnWB553mR7fDgFruc6X6oTFEevwMf
I6xnCaM+aSNRwHY7NYXPzg5ua7o0XZI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Y81zoIzlTIQ8JORrSz16DDuB3LCPjgg1v6nYmCqQTmr2cXwczHKsjw5Am21WSknaTY/CdqdA==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ca50:0:b0:3f0:80cf:f2d5 with SMTP id
m16-20020a7bca50000000b003f080cff2d5mr6691789wml.11.1681216049239;
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 05:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (93-55-83-125.ip262.fastwebnet.it. [93.55.83.125])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
h7-20020a05600c350700b003ee9f396dcesm21034611wmq.30.2023.04.11.05.27.28
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 05:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:27:27 +0200
Message-Id: <CRTXCM2IHVCZ.3OICMAE871TH2@vincent-arch>
From: "Vincenzo Palazzo" <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
To: "Murch" <murch@murch.one>, "Bitcoin Protocol Discussion"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: aerc 0.14.0
References: <e2293b77-aef3-62cf-01e3-d89a7beb8e8c@murch.one>
<6bb373cc-bee0-13a3-a510-b65d4faa867f@murch.one>
In-Reply-To: <6bb373cc-bee0-13a3-a510-b65d4faa867f@murch.one>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:59:43 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology
BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:32 -0000
On Wed Apr 5, 2023 at 8:54 PM CEST, Murch via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Over the years, I have participated in a few conversations about various=
=20
> aspects of transactions. Often a chunk of the conversation is spent on=20
> establishing a shared vocabulary. There are many competing terms=E2=80=94=
e.g. I=20
> can think of at least three additional terms that refer to `scriptPubKey`=
.
>
> I=E2=80=99ve drafted an informational BIP that proposes terminology for v=
arious=20
> components and aspects of transactions. As some established terms are=20
> already contradictory, the proposal does not aim for a perfectly=20
> consistent selection of terms, but rather just to establish a shared=20
> vocabulary to avoid confusion.
>
> Draft: https://github.com/Xekyo/bips/pull/1
>
> Please let me know whether you=E2=80=99d be interested in the creation of=
such a=20
> BIP.
Make a lot of sense to me, just recently I found that=20
I was using a complete different word to refering to `scriptPubKey`=20
that only me was using :)
So, concept ACK.
Thanks!
Vincent.
|
