summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/53/b9f22ffdbdda99722a1da0965fe0533eb1004a
blob: 0de89d27c8ba8243a651635da0e48a78696870d6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1Svwdk-0007BW-PF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:32:32 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.216.175; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qc0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Svwdk-0000Cp-4p
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:32:32 +0000
Received: by qcad10 with SMTP id d10so3297057qca.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.100.129 with SMTP id ey1mr397267igb.35.1343680345978; Mon,
	30 Jul 2012 13:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.33.77 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1343679972.9880.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1343679972.9880.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:32:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQcGoEpD74S0SaiNxOe0NiLmUWqbJ14zPNp+AUCmueLaw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1Svwdk-0000Cp-4p
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 22 - getmemorypool
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:32:32 -0000

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> luke-jr wants me to split this BIP into 3 separate BIPs because he says that other devs felt it was too unfocused and covered too many topics. However this discussion took place on IRC, a

It actually took place on this list:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20120612105038.GA29784%40vps7135.xlshosting.net&forum_name=bitcoin-development

It just took some IRC prodding to get Luke to move in the direction of
breaking it up to get the optional parts that Pieter objected to out
of the spec.

Perhaps other people missed it too... so discussing it more sounds
fine if anyone objects.