1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE1289E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:28:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C169E13F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:28:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DB5E38A6FC2;
Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:27:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151114:gubatron@gmail.com::d+oxFE7ubAiig/sd:aW1DU
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151114:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::d9JaIsf6+deFZNd/:aQqAm
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151114:jtimon@jtimon.cc::/G//kHi+3lT8teAk:a9mrj
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151114:johnsock@gmail.com::qb+eFay+z/2InYpa:SE2R
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Angel Leon <gubatron@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:27:51 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.9-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
References: <201511132228.47815.luke@dashjr.org>
<201511142111.24046.luke@dashjr.org>
<CADZB0_Z3Kf4GW0VATjb10kJF0aFgyFOcqX_=y+LFoUpsi+TRUA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZB0_Z3Kf4GW0VATjb10kJF0aFgyFOcqX_=y+LFoUpsi+TRUA@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201511142127.53255.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
John Sacco <johnsock@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP - Block size doubles at each reward halving
with max block size of 32M
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:28:33 -0000
On Saturday, November 14, 2015 9:15:07 PM Angel Leon wrote:
> "the economy does not necessarily include miners"
> so the money supply isn't part of the economy?
Not in the context of economic majority deciding hardforks. After all, the
outcome of the hardfork *determines* the money supply. So the former money
supply not supporting the change would just mean they cease to be involved in
that capacity. But even aside from that, the more relevant factor in terms of
economic involvement is /acceptance/ of bitcoins as payment for real goods.
Luke
|
