summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/52/84755d9576c605793944cb3c79c167e08398ee
blob: cf83696b529011556eee17decd5808c4375c6aa1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF2D411
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:52:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFEAFD
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:52:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D97D8108040A;
	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:150725:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::NKNEYmG7F6+Hm3H0:XKaj
X-Hashcash: 1:25:150725:jeremy.l.rubin.travel@gmail.com::2urBiY43MFf7d3Lo:WhwB
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Jeremy Rubin <jeremy.l.rubin.travel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:51:53 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.1-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAJ+8mENU5kQuKg=-UAh05qGEPS1OuiKTgXFVGcF0Z0gsRo+Czw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+8mENU5kQuKg=-UAh05qGEPS1OuiKTgXFVGcF0Z0gsRo+Czw@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201507251951.53970.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Draft: Minimum Viable TXIn Hash
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 19:52:16 -0000

On Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:12:19 PM Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Please see the following draft BIP which should decrease the amount of
> bytes needed per transaction. This is very much a draft BIP, as the design
> space for this type of improvement is large.
> 
> This BIP can be rolled out by a soft fork.
> 
> Improvements are around 12% for  standard "one in two out" txn, and even
> more with more inputs hashes.
> 
> https://gist.github.com/JeremyRubin/e175662d2b8bf814a688

This looks like just a p2p protocol optimisation, which doesn't even need a 
softfork. You do need to document the suggested protocol changes more 
specifically, however.

Luke