1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B18640F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:24:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com
[209.85.212.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDDF140
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:24:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicmv11 with SMTP id mv11so59303022wic.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 02:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Y4hv5kFZjkykJcXrCRyWL/tm7d5x9kR/3Mwmde2Nav4=;
b=JKXF4s+87m35765d3RCDYjjUQRTSAwYITMJR/ilBxzUPW0cVioi9Lhm/Dqoc1ye6KC
tzB8/PenklO/T0QZUPOU2sH5TCYcFAYJma5ob3kVLIF6iT5dyqjJAiiY3jiFM9FVt7cz
L4eCApIEJRXq89J7MOWFg+c8JlgzcZmShL/wuSFkOZT6/CdkbcJwupUWYunbI6pHKDXK
gTNqdVSY3byRlSY2NIKhYGIpSTltJ97d4yuojP5vzrMxjP4CFQiMl2MlvNrlUBFhBiL3
XzNyZ5gN6UBKXLU+VGsLWspU2OyGyl7D7JGY76UG/tmnkw5unLhO3ERCP+P0Y0wiKrA6
6F4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFMigB0B5xXP6qOjVuRIG3pwC7cpBj1PKRH+ZyWyrj0BVJ7XLq2Cak91I9vFSR4zdqCKfL
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.92.40 with SMTP id cj8mr3233332wib.92.1437211486830;
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 02:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 02:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDq-FKwAO+7sJdFR9sLND=gy5OrnyU+UQEtDxnoMn+BH-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADm_WcZKoMAhYvXbFMbE+5K9HOD75YkQu8_qTW4S6YN6ZMrfjA@mail.gmail.com>
<201507172029.17056.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAE-z3OWZdi2K6k-J063pqUgbBep0ELuZ1rm83wR5ox=kZ8CUQA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDq-FKwAO+7sJdFR9sLND=gy5OrnyU+UQEtDxnoMn+BH-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:24:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDpTHejpj-X50U1nfHgWTvLzw6Ar59keNoHdGSFMtQG_7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:24:49 -0000
Sorry...
More specifically, how many people made it to
https://github.com/jtimon/bips/blob/bip-forks/bip-forks.org#uncontroversial=
-hardforks
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote=
:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hardforks are not something where voting makes sense. They need consens=
us
>>> among /nodes/, not majority among /miners/. No hardfork has ever had su=
ch
>>> a
>>> vote.
>>
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> I meant that since some of the new hard fork proposals use a voting syst=
em
>> for activation, they may not want to establish that precedent.
>
> I wonder how many people read
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008936.h=
tml
> apart from you...
|
