1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0077DC002B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Feb 2023 11:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCB140516
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Feb 2023 11:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org CBCB140516
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=SynXOUvL
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LLncAzJswW8C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Feb 2023 11:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org E767F403F8
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com
[64.147.123.19])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E767F403F8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Feb 2023 11:49:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8B43200970;
Thu, 2 Feb 2023 06:49:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Feb 2023 06:49:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id
:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to
:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm3; t=1675338574; x=1675424974; bh=2N/uPVQlHrd6xF87gBvTpac3DzRS
OWjG2LSBF6msMec=; b=SynXOUvL/KNeiCtGJBqIQHcn7psIIcfwqoakX25+0JVv
UcSYQPRx5Q4CWAkq2ThFp2iyWhveHGCA0FcK97fwWkkUk909Zi0I7cEn8xnTK4WP
ur8aG03qw+vc4dqvgeOcT5UcgHhEhgqbYBXG7K/ayd78QqVr3vlVSOBAWWoOnxM7
K39NTAPsPPTzckAvjMenOUIc3atjV78X6JjRSOZGmEFJYSqR2X3HDbPkjQAJ9DVh
XldMQ4SKgFhEPC4roz4MPufJKr3VfKw9m0dhkkj3vZzlPB9t2F5P4Vgd1DykEN6z
T8XJszJP+JYmG2CfK5NXoZPSg8o9eTDk1H4HcMhKNA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:TaPbY02tB94q2kPCTgl85rMxPBiSuRgR2Pull-NatFL9i8frQruTzA>
<xme:TaPbY_ET6j8x806X3J-LhpBsgSj-VCuwzT4ytGmPU1eqXN8ZpasGne5Qi8bgtgHJo
yj7IAQal8mrhmaNW6I>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:TaPbY85bIdyV7vCgL2QyaoxgLUYaRzR_nWKYckrUU5hFs58Vm2gk2gTS0Sh9>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudefkedgfedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgv
rhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtth
gvrhhnpeelvdellefftddukeduffejgfefjeeuheeileeftdfgteduteeggeevueethfej
tdenucffohhmrghinhepphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii
gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdr
ohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TaPbY92Wej3iwUEcPEriWBLNT3VIwfIkLcVNpR5SX4OFI7pkqV8nEA>
<xmx:TaPbY3GOvEbTnB7794UuP2FGUAwCExux69v9qFUK1EakMtLo34564g>
<xmx:TaPbY2_IVFW38uvnuzKo7svHo3GP0YMW8clrd47Netsz8fkMbx9yGg>
<xmx:TqPbY7hhDDos3S65PaTndysYLeCwktfzmom6KOH_z-ysGbsK_xUrXA>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu,
2 Feb 2023 06:49:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 98F525F824; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 06:49:32 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 06:49:32 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>
Message-ID: <Y9ujTCAv+/du+zNU@petertodd.org>
References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com>
<764E460B-C0C6-47B8-A97E-F7CBC81FD645@petertodd.org>
<Y9pxAdm3kO1rr2kU@camus> <Y9uc72RSs6LQojG4@petertodd.org>
<16446c77-c9de-7b11-8e66-7f8e20421cba@peersm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Tp7te20Rjsb6/KCw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <16446c77-c9de-7b11-8e66-7f8e20421cba@peersm.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE
OP_IF OP_PUSH
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 11:49:37 -0000
--Tp7te20Rjsb6/KCw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:45:42PM +0100, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
> As far as I can read nobody replied to the initial question: what is
> considered as good/best practice to store in Bitcoin?
Your answer is beyond not putting unspendable data in the UTXO set, the exa=
ct
details don't really matter. Do what makes sense for your specific applicat=
ion.
> Reiterating my question: what are the current rules for OP_RETURN, max
> size and number of OP_RETURN per tx
Max 80 bytes, one OpReturn output per tx.
This of course is the standardness rule. With a miner willing to mine non-s=
td
transactions anything goes.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--Tp7te20Rjsb6/KCw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0RcYcKRzsEwFZ3N5Lly11TVRLzcFAmPbo0oACgkQLly11TVR
LzefxRAAvisE/VX7D1nS8BIp02iwBESfG/HEb5obKINPgY9RYGtk6oc+vHhZZICA
C6CL80YcBgvCTkRY/D6/0AYjpgaI8K87aRbhktht4PJ9f2JeUue/rvDGY++YW75A
YDg02E7+ipN/5NdRd79YZAmUVOO4nl8ibIaWw1f58ibdxqNnF0Nc8OduNdE5mcke
visEdapfQ5eVa7LzyTFTERrZqOiofzOmPCPWgpbqfFtYhOYszUXnsum7fIbPuVId
uZB9B+h2Yq07aupgVqKVkrzzSY0B8tbAEx+vkZly+3m01jwEbksxKcPeq5gmH7o8
zmMjWyxx6JjCsZ6711losikgJhdt0hZb40zxeVP5fSRtxvhg9ZmpBvIxjtiMle2F
YgRojYQCQwU2HIRMLfhPdCCIvVWH4YH2wayGPB8W2nDe8dDHyYvQnVxNXQeqhr4K
7ci0G1REXfLW49AB+Q7D48lumXfRiQOEhorqWbg0BKyNplfZteQ4LqBoekVkGAxC
j+tkltvircFiFl2UokEdia3TLaPQ5F3HCGFI5ZSbErUYdeFQMZvvncP9YrRykMjL
XAvXGDl0uXKaOkx7YBd/kLfg28iDxguY21d0Q2XeuZcufMHIUut99xakVs3YkW92
IvGadrW58eoQeQJ7zvXxtPIa7e3wybgvO/XOZYBSZ73wY2epL7U=
=IKGT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Tp7te20Rjsb6/KCw--
|
