1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <realemilengler@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F029F0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:01:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com (mail-wm1-f53.google.com
[209.85.128.53])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE736D6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:01:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id u8so4455847wmm.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 08 Jun 2019 08:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=XMU0azuiVHij9TV6T8BVqJP26xXawmGGncLmf7N1/AU=;
b=IYBgyTHkiU7VBHSMp0/hrEpDKiDV3o6Nc8SNXCX4M11aHWbk437t7Y0xV0chUn78MA
q1YTBaQqA5I12teCDs/Vc6ayZWFe3a57tIhQJBFY6ywl6KnDlrab5YS/qOKLtvN7JHi9
kJ4dqvNIyEGpGqKlWn92BsWEJyNVveVuNpsEhQMMwaJWzYVjGXE0mKv5QVLcOswReV0v
oKUrQeVRRbic0SobGes87u4Io7jgvIaBi757nIB8tO0WhiYDt+fpqa2jx1VeYNCOoiR2
soXwHFJBRySJJQJmemMiqn4xV609ZiWbVZc9KY6omQM28urAQTYNBP13lL/Jt1r9hWuA
X4ng==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV6viCKFuyXtYtPzGFEG28uL5ijSMjAT/osinBZ1AvS6o+tZ4tq
VzW7RBo+yHDVkGYXhkvEDy8niH+u
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXZJUkwuKWSsuVZR4OwHQ+wA9+PYDVXmLA/LUsW6zEp0NVKmcyoU6urQPsOsjLPyWUj4y7lg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9cd1:: with SMTP id f200mr5599212wme.157.1560006111396;
Sat, 08 Jun 2019 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b?
([2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b5sm5242214wru.69.2019.06.08.08.01.50
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 08 Jun 2019 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <205859a9-635a-e958-a03f-8d9a35e0da1a@emilengler.com>
<CABaSBawPvOoTwQYQ0ZQc20b3g9GMp_fdz7cogHW25o40iF2UeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Emil Engler <me@emilengler.com>
Message-ID: <cbe4190d-ee49-b6f0-de99-c526fabff6ab@emilengler.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 17:01:50 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBawPvOoTwQYQ0ZQc20b3g9GMp_fdz7cogHW25o40iF2UeA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 08:19:23 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] testnet4
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 15:01:53 -0000
I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be resetted just because there is
a (probably better) alternative for it. The testnet is still a thing and
is also used.
Am 08.06.19 um 16:21 schrieb Bryan Bishop:
> Be greeted Emil,
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 9:21 AM Emil Engler via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> Hello, I tried myself with some Bitcoin development. For this I used of
> course the Bitcoin testnet. However it took me one hour to sync the
> blockchain with around 1538358 blocks. In my opinion that is too much
> for a testnet. Especially the blockchain size with around 26GB is so
> much. Would it be possible to reset the testnet with a new genesis
> block
> ? And if so, can we setup a fixed cycle for resetting the testnet (For
> example every second 1st of January) ?
>
>
> At the moment, I somewhat doubt this is likely to happen. Signet
> provides an alternative for configuring multiple separate private and
> public testing networks. If you would like to get involved, check out
> the recent discussion on the topic recorded here:
> http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2019-06-07-signet/
>
> - Bryan
> http://heybryan.org/
|
