summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/50/5c0c78dd6c567997a6d447ad7688d79fd685c0
blob: c1d3c7174564e8db0411c042b60ddad266a777dd (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
Return-Path: <gmkarl@gmail.com>
Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5E4C0176
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 23 May 2020 11:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0D2883DA
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 23 May 2020 11:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id WUpN5UDfnT-L
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 23 May 2020 11:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io1-f43.google.com (mail-io1-f43.google.com
 [209.85.166.43])
 by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D22C883D8
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 23 May 2020 11:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io1-f43.google.com with SMTP id p20so836429iop.11
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 23 May 2020 04:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=kkJDzxEwjdjJq8Er5IQOLRFkL3F5i8YM/691/k3ZsQM=;
 b=fwPHG+68fgoG+bmUcLqG30YlT6h9Tg/x8DDj37+ouEg/ascwO/eVkf52Sk5xRV7CgE
 f09BMph1r88ccNAMUhNaaTWtp+XkV/eCSJLbdaDbhguIk/xQfB7uHEKXSik9Zibw7E/g
 7mMXNNIzAyqgr7+2r4PW/AfgtWytqqoirIud8SVzfySOLUFFs4yfC7WCr4mVrufaB1ap
 4mVEl8OFiRXcqU5QSzWIqJLJYTnhVrxElA3Ow0O6asdujL2iO76gUjXXEEdHGC5+9N/X
 mrsZrSbdhou/lRrVry/JTK8Tp3KUNUhooHXKq8apNNdO9Sos6AjlowZG7/y2ifL9hSz0
 jJjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=kkJDzxEwjdjJq8Er5IQOLRFkL3F5i8YM/691/k3ZsQM=;
 b=a5fKaYoz0t1wQAjLKOJTV1jMhq6XUzaOCMvP6y1b+T3vpCPlF8Yr2wEEIOtwYUs2qz
 jTFyt4biWj/A0PAbmMxsastVorX2kY5pFAgZzChlwMp6XNiPh8I9cWY1QeAw4Nv/ekep
 hnQgKqpvQErASLqQo70CJPseQF3XJk+V5to5tV5KL7z8az3pi8etyjcIiDkQtm1uGexY
 GPp/oo/hVRBvtgmwYZL9aV17LxnyCWcVRD/OpEnd9UIe30veO05Mvu23cWqORetVnMrF
 EXUqRx9mVC1ePcc5q69PVHQjDNXAZA1uiPBsvS/oQ62pYJA+Vp2rqhPXkuev+SusqQ8p
 GR6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ocFNI3A4W0cn56rheVaux9TVfBw2h6lClToCkTvONSqUvKwiw
 q46xx17Cso/Q5jTDPOxxTPq2kCSWgJgv0HyCGUd+oXwI680=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeIbZSDblPqX1/MZYrXFEC5xqeyXs0vf48HMmXPQoCe8auo7x0jgclQ5qmdELLKGEK+o6RNrMzuTYEjNUd2yg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8411:: with SMTP id h17mr6696910ioj.1.1590231667275;
 Sat, 23 May 2020 04:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mailman.2587.1590231461.32591.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2587.1590231461.32591.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 07:00:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CALL-=e4Eg=iRbZOV+SAzn3_NhZrS-QviDgZdSmxLQTLvoMduPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a37c7205a64ea961"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 23 May 2020 13:03:48 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] hashcash-newhash
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 11:01:09 -0000

--000000000000a37c7205a64ea961
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,

I'd like to revisit the discussion of the digest algorithm used in hashcash.

I believe migrating to new hashing algorithms as a policy would
significantly increase decentralization and hence security.

I believe the impact on existing miners could be made pleasant by gradually
moving the block reward from the previous hash to the next (such that both
are accepted with different rewards).  An appropriate rate could possibly
be calculated from the difficulty.

You could develop the frequency of introduction of new hashes such that
once present-day ASICs are effectively obsolete anyway due to competition,
new ones do not have time to develop.

I'm interested in hearing thoughts and concerns.

Karl Semich

--000000000000a37c7205a64ea961
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">Hi,</span><div dir=
=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" styl=
e=3D"font-family:sans-serif">I&#39;d like to revisit the discussion of the =
digest algorithm used in hashcash.</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-fam=
ily:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif=
">I believe migrating to new hashing algorithms as a policy would significa=
ntly increase decentralization and hence security.</div><div dir=3D"auto" s=
tyle=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-f=
amily:sans-serif">I believe the impact on existing miners could be made ple=
asant by gradually moving the block reward from the previous hash to the ne=
xt (such that both are accepted with different rewards).=C2=A0 An appropria=
te rate could possibly be calculated from the difficulty.</div><div dir=3D"=
auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D=
"font-family:sans-serif">You could develop the frequency of introduction of=
 new hashes such that once present-day ASICs are effectively obsolete anywa=
y due to competition, new ones do not have time to develop.</div><div dir=
=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto" styl=
e=3D"font-family:sans-serif">I&#39;m interested in hearing thoughts and con=
cerns.</div><div dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto" style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">Karl Semich</div></div>

--000000000000a37c7205a64ea961--