1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1Z5bFV-0001fU-Sf
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:57:01 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.176; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-ob0-f176.google.com;
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Z5bFT-0007ss-VR
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:57:01 +0000
Received: by obbsn1 with SMTP id sn1so55707293obb.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=8txLrSkabk/A8edoVrTjggHSYuyqJWUleyCwTlZGUxg=;
b=WNoKY+y6HLaefYgPuyRxqamSODOXOSlywkC455Uzn8POpYG+TLptGQGaeQPpAveKXp
bO73ZuGOCy46fQSz1jk0KWybUWwJILE7NzAzZ/8o5d8aILrujkZ6Zi6F78D1MmH3jG3K
2rweigcADUorQEAZ8cgJrYYI/bY5yZDqP5xbL9DWQterF7hj8XONVh/lwRIJWpV+dVd/
Q0vjWvL7U5WRLzaiDbKgeWS7tDqtA1ZmfxyBUEkOGFoSnuvK2hmIM39Gf/xsUoOqKDsf
8fdoXQxQ00rTjgt5RMcC+lfHHhvDDjnUdoFTkLSFxN1w+jX2NBVG/Nxl8aGntXFC7sjo
ZanA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpW0m5h0EH4yr/Gj18ZF9yEc2om6onZ0kpPGs8j6BdUTs4gd5hFD/LImNn5L9CXGG0PAH4
X-Received: by 10.202.55.7 with SMTP id e7mr8885615oia.56.1434639414432; Thu,
18 Jun 2015 07:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.108.149 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5582DB62.8000700@bitcoins.info>
References: <55828737.6000007@riseup.net>
<CANEZrP3M7+BsZKLFZV-0A_fC7NmMGbTDxsx3ywru3dSW78ZskQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20150618111407.GA6690@amethyst.visucore.com>
<CAPg+sBj_go==m6-++sA53imYdz4OLH4bkyiuAyEM8YR8CaTd=w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP04SUHShoqUkA3aSs3yEP3GSsZ_3ZOGFXyJfNve5KTPfA@mail.gmail.com>
<20150618140544.GA7674@amethyst.visucore.com>
<5582DB62.8000700@bitcoins.info>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:56:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0NuUXbf=-4wRKQH3GMzSttLnGiWJA79dGSgN8zywY8mUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113cea26adab390518cc04bf
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.8 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1Z5bFT-0007ss-VR
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer
to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:57:01 -0000
--001a113cea26adab390518cc04bf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info> wrote:
> >So I'm *not* the decider for anything that concerns the behavior of
> the global consensus, and I cannot be, as I have explained in the
> previous post.
>
> The person who decides if a pull request is accepted is a decider and
> significantly affects the behavior of the global consensus. The only
> option for someone who doesn't agree is to hard fork. There is no way
> around that and you should just accept that fact and move on.
>
Impacts, yes, decider, no. Multiple ACKs are required from developers who
will not act if the community will disagree with the change.
The users ultimately choose by deciding which software to download, and
that dictates the range of choices available.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
--001a113cea26adab390518cc04bf
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Milly Bitcoin <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:milly@bitcoins.info" target=3D"_blank">milly=
@bitcoins.info</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">=C2=A0&g=
t;So I'm *not* the decider for anything that concerns the behavior of<b=
r>
the global consensus, and I cannot be, as I have explained in the<br>
</span>previous post.<br>
<br>
The person who decides if a pull request is accepted is a decider and<br>
significantly affects the behavior of the global consensus.=C2=A0 The only<=
br>
option for someone who doesn't agree is to hard fork.=C2=A0 There is no=
way<br>
around that and you should just accept that fact and move on.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Impacts, yes, decider, no.=C2=A0 Multiple ACKs are r=
equired from developers who will not act if the community will disagree wit=
h the change.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail=
_extra">The users ultimately choose by deciding which software to download,=
and that dictates the range of choices available.<br clear=3D"all"><div><b=
r></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">Jeff Garzik<br>Bitcoin core d=
eveloper and open source evangelist<br>BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a =
href=3D"https://bitpay.com/" target=3D"_blank">https://bitpay.com/</a></div=
>
</div></div>
--001a113cea26adab390518cc04bf--
|
