1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Return-Path: <bram@bittorrent.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3286C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 02:18:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com
[209.85.223.172])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3469147
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 2 Apr 2017 02:18:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b140so58821262iof.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=bittorrent-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=bWqU+mThBNIC8+KXiO9Tr9GqEtJn8/4gXFP+77OynRo=;
b=BuCblnrEPyb067rNm8OAH0un6VJeBj2e9dO0pL44VITbfoZj8XIn93b8WykWscANnt
MCZzAlNC4UPlTt1k0Ub4X/Av745HfWr5IJK/jbiD+ctL4rf6aQIWuDKr0wo+yMQPJ9gC
8CNOeYDZ5wVf+Qmb2EZJUH98o2IGdh0y32fbCMnfKeDnIopgMrTcB28KRPwbc917Ll74
kBAJrcBrtieNv2c4gvPKLLkBxHzQDkQJ2IE611Oa/vJ6n7ay8iwvkZGNTws2f2Jj473W
f2RUpNJWm7ZJZzrCjevY54qBn83b9qrRVDCnE2mA+wRGG+WyJR0fTGznC1nK2CYSA/CP
cOtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=bWqU+mThBNIC8+KXiO9Tr9GqEtJn8/4gXFP+77OynRo=;
b=io2EhQoCtlN5hY8wgheua/L7lXgp9zTmhXo+4DrfIlFJ6dH9zCZdj39/w3ScrqwMCn
LuPn0J2E/fx4CTRONFAIpQhNH1I1WElcFrF2GbB9pXFZhY/dFVlAFVqx2t3v3QWTLBYA
ZXtyDdVC7pACb5lKFw3bpp4r2zmrNfLk/Wdfx3Oj8NpbLhNiMg9GsyoljoTnCmw0yRs9
B9Nr5tA1/w8LUPNp/7+OkcXZFEKgGqqdSuTMWX0p7deYTt6GfD6S3sbjJmjOJfZgokLX
rSq+aM8qP/oLz2S7fhHsfL3SSB2R8Xlt3m8+LNZgZ1APschPy710CFl3d4RlKyWyF26S
IBlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0tXF5gqa7Drmk7/eSvEf9NG42VIUhksEFHpE8383mNJBMHtTbQ8sBNGBj56TJQ6niH3eBxHsItP+4TOy5+
X-Received: by 10.107.50.206 with SMTP id y197mr10961278ioy.214.1491099506398;
Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.184.70 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 19:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8f4fSx74VGLlhmwWm7Gwzl5qNMd6okkHcBlCT55CRkYxa_lrEHL-C0hARMXcTaf4CNVIh8no1CHJF-_bmZJRJDsx1H10PCrI45X0D7QdukE=@protonmail.com>
References: <CEaHrHj5i8IQC75k1BY8e6a-4l-Wdq6vofQRYGQTtwx43uhcgzpg29Pbeh72d5LP5rQwxuCzevrGGnD2Bg8NKsDkUGCyzTwPczlbH2pOjgg=@protonmail.com>
<d89b85f6e5dbeaefc6402596dfc3c843@cock.lu>
<Agqv6Is87aXmNkFS0XphXWCE2TTZuuRJP8shQaomIUqx6W789WvMwflWqnSCQCwLPglEJ2rq3SkF-8tzYaZixbW9Ph-6u4a6sRCu4w-fPmA=@protonmail.com>
<CA+KqGkoNyHbw_6thOPSLKK9xMVgJtkDWwCZgwhoEQm1pD8_kDw@mail.gmail.com>
<8f4fSx74VGLlhmwWm7Gwzl5qNMd6okkHcBlCT55CRkYxa_lrEHL-C0hARMXcTaf4CNVIh8no1CHJF-_bmZJRJDsx1H10PCrI45X0D7QdukE=@protonmail.com>
From: Bram Cohen <bram@bittorrent.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 19:18:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+KqGkpLJasuYqn9tzA_CUihwmoRqpQZ_exOUT_uqGYEesvceQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: praxeology_guy <praxeology_guy@protonmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11447954677045054c25a8d5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Guessing the spentness status of the pruned
relatives
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 02:18:27 -0000
--001a11447954677045054c25a8d5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:58 PM, praxeology_guy <
praxeology_guy@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Bram Cohen,
>
> In R&D: First its appropriate to explore all interesting ideas, and help
> each other improve their ideas. Last, when there is a deadline that needs
> to be met, we compare various options and decide on which to go with.
>
> I'm on the First step still.
>
In that case you should read my txo bitfield proposal, instead of taking my
postings yesterday as a prompt to respond to something completely unrelated.
> If you really want to push me to saying it, I'm not a fan of the Patricia
> Tree for bitcoin txos. I think its too much work for everyone to do when
> other options are available. But I'm not trying to say that your design is
> bad or wont work... I'm just personally not interested in it at this time.
>
My bitfield proposal is different from the patricia trie stuff. Also your
objection about patricia tries being 'too much work' is nonsensical because
they're quite a bit simpler than MMRs.
--001a11447954677045054c25a8d5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
at, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:58 PM, praxeology_guy <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D=
"mailto:praxeology_guy@protonmail.com" target=3D"_blank">praxeology_guy@pro=
tonmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Br=
am Cohen,<br></div><div><br></div><div>In R&D: First its appropriate to=
explore all interesting ideas, and help each other improve their ideas.=C2=
=A0 Last, when there is a deadline that needs to be met, we compare various=
options and decide on which to go with.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I'=
;m on the First step still.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>In th=
at case you should read my txo bitfield proposal, instead of taking my post=
ings yesterday as a prompt to respond to something completely unrelated.</d=
iv><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0=
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>If you really want =
to push me to saying it, I'm not a fan of the Patricia Tree for bitcoin=
txos.=C2=A0 I think its too much work for everyone to do when other option=
s are available.=C2=A0 But I'm not trying to say that your design is ba=
d or wont work... I'm just personally not interested in it at this time=
.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>My bitfield proposal is differe=
nt from the patricia trie stuff. Also your objection about patricia tries b=
eing 'too much work' is nonsensical because they're quite a bit=
simpler than MMRs.</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>
--001a11447954677045054c25a8d5--
|
