summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/4d/f8cd54d54f7c073b26acff1c8fbf684cb7d37b
blob: 202c603efcbcc99db56549e20034679a78dc1a85 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <eric@voskuil.org>) id 1YILwp-000890-MI
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:42:11 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YILwo-0000sS-Hl
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:42:11 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id rd3so85512090pab.9
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to;
	bh=Fs10Tu9Un19RNRXLpr8jai5lEGRY2P0eIJkm4955TxQ=;
	b=ZxtVkc5nVQDIQC2R4yFFzIpqvvFU/eNelYkm1vgUGB7VImIpxhyOg7pSWI56Nm5zCX
	uDc5rEYbWehX13ygQKGi9RIFTGzS9KHhOQ9l0HtXAVjKxmmcOyijkDFVt1wbs7EVyk6i
	RC7uVOI+5nHjTSDSHGVewZdV6JiMja/MmT3akJpUZuZdqNPk/c0ln2Aay5tUaevr+FkF
	46OQxo2bugaf3E8KZJymxGAVRjbxuf6K9qRnpTCR8L20pHm0mxobVZLf1+5tRKSV/7ef
	0d8XERv86E/dLac01236wChnHheyiy6Wp+yDDgaxs103dwf+K+9/QYkGwjSqnOVQN6dh
	KFJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlaUXccnPOhGuo6qb7O/MCNDys84XffWQx8Nei9gvg/+tMieQP1JZaj+C9S9OBBPhyJhNup
X-Received: by 10.68.189.71 with SMTP id gg7mr728416pbc.21.1422900704579;
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:11:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.125.42.145] (mobile-166-171-121-213.mycingular.net.
	[166.171.121.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	ox2sm19508025pdb.21.2015.02.02.10.11.43
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:11:44 -0800 (PST)
References: <27395C55-CF59-4E65-83CA-73F903272C5F@gmail.com>
	<54CE3816.6020505@bitwatch.co>
	<68C03646-02E7-43C6-9B73-E4697F3AA5FD@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <68C03646-02E7-43C6-9B73-E4697F3AA5FD@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <05590A33-1802-4C15-91C0-8777ACD8440B@voskuil.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B440)
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:05:57 -0700
To: Brian Erdelyi <brian.erdelyi@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1YILwo-0000sS-Hl
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to address Bitcoin malware
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:42:11 -0000

In sending the first-signed transaction to another for second signature, how=
 does the first signer authenticate to the second without compromising the  i=
ndependence of the two factors?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 2, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Brian Erdelyi <brian.erdelyi@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>=20
> Another concept...
>=20
> It should be possible to use multisig wallets to protect against malware. =
 For example, a user could generate a wallet with 3 keys and require a trans=
action that has been signed by 2 of those keys.  One key is placed in cold s=
torage and anther sent to a third-party.
>=20
> It is now possible to generate and sign transactions on the users computer=
 and send this signed transaction to the third-party for the second signatur=
e.  This now permits the use of out of band transaction verification techniq=
ues before the third party signs the transaction and sends to the blockchain=
.
>=20
> If the third-party is malicious or becomes compromised they would not have=
 the ability to complete transactions as they only have one private key.  If=
 the third-party disappeared, the user could use the key in cold storage to s=
ign transactions and send funds to a new wallet.
>=20
> Thoughts?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is yo=
ur
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a=

> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development