1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <ben@benlabs.net>) id 1UGYT4-00034E-R8
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:30:58 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1UGYT1-0002DU-6N
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:30:58 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 16so3478609obc.19
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=ecvktsto9lVpKLlex2MzD1qlIbwa3zY9O1vrHSKgvGw=;
b=RbPbCxgmRjwWInR2lrydPc/FqYxwqBA1sQsdAtMFC0LsZA1C7y/Sdi5GU9iNT4Hqsj
zLgDnJhMRga0mzwVNwD0MlKeaSJtb2QAoxebVTMlT5kJF5zwWJfqodLSBFb/p8joX41m
lKQv0i38EuGsJZB9ff7iTHAKTGN38e6wNrjpRFgzf+qS9fZFnyegmmuDyIAjDh7EM+4f
uOvDoiXCP5Ym6zWW30qYcZy1vnyZx2NJe4PMQ3i9wMhpznMkd75aWJZrmt71+SPjVBsy
GKyUwzLcjsnMMfkGnR1siScTAsIBp52DJS6faTbSb9RUCTGRmn5OECints2dQ5BgmpOw
DwQA==
X-Received: by 10.182.156.103 with SMTP id wd7mr3236413obb.33.1363367184759;
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (c-68-47-235-12.hsd1.tn.comcast.net.
[68.47.235.12])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc8sm2475899obc.8.2013.03.15.10.06.22
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Benjamin Lindner <ben@benlabs.net>
In-Reply-To: <51411744.6010908@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:06:20 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D0FC8006-AF19-4E92-87B4-A4FE356D4577@benlabs.net>
References: <201303131256.30144.luke@dashjr.org>
<201303132106.45334.andyparkins@gmail.com>
<201303132114.04596.luke@dashjr.org>
<20130313212243.GQ96148@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
<CAAS2fgSLmjhMmmrxjKQ0KOX5EEM4=+Wwebuaw4NHE9LdtLSP6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20130313213608.GR96148@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
<51411744.6010908@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyng8pvyEq2ZoW8r13/rxQR/KLeuxVPwLRfDKPXUnUhAoWsuN5jZXx9WobtAwhIi9ViQ3b
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1UGYT1-0002DU-6N
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.1 ideas
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:30:59 -0000
On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Cameron Garnham <da2ce7@gmail.com> wrote:
> For me, everyone signed up to bitcoin thinking that there was a 1MB /
> block limit. The lock limits were unexpected, and could be considered
> extremely uncontroversial to remove.
This. Software behavior which is not described by the source code should =
not be considered an integral part of the rule set.
Any influence of external libraries on the consensus mechanism is =
unacceptable.=
|
