1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <timon.elviejo@gmail.com>) id 1SJN6D-0005od-Sm
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:54:29 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.47; envelope-from=timon.elviejo@gmail.com;
helo=mail-vb0-f47.google.com;
Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.212.47])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1SJN6D-0006Ox-3m
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:54:29 +0000
Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so4414152vbb.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.150.14 with SMTP id w14mr3959277vcv.59.1334487263525; Sun,
15 Apr 2012 03:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.154.131 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpc5CZ9Sx4MwPdeS0-5frnV9B+mJ5OwcPoUVrygTawiJBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+8xBpc5CZ9Sx4MwPdeS0-5frnV9B+mJ5OwcPoUVrygTawiJBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:54:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGQP0AGbLYZYwKGb0AHOPx3BadBQ399A67ntEo98mpm=kKgZ+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <timon.elviejo@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(timon.elviejo[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
freemails
X-Headers-End: 1SJN6D-0006Ox-3m
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin TX fill-or-kill deterministic
behavior
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jtimonmv@gmail.com
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:54:30 -0000
On 4/12/12, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> wrote:
> 1. N = 1 or 2 or whatever the community prefers. Ideally enough time
> for a third-tier miner, mining strange TXs, finds a block.
> 2. H1 = height of block chain, when a TX is received
> 3. H2 = H1 + (144 * N)
> 4. If block chain height reaches H2, and TX has not made it into a
> block, drop TX from memory pool
Why not just adding a field expiration_block = H2?
It seems more explicit and flexible than using a 144 * N constant.
You're changing the protocol anyway, right?
Another question, aren't different peers going to get different H1 for
the same tx?
|
