1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Return-Path: <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69AD8323
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:51:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com
[209.85.217.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D5E144
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:51:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbpo10 with SMTP id po10so16752258lbb.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=doXis15+8uIlMqz9KLUvDMQq9VvHE1bWH9g/7khqljo=;
b=xXQkjr/AdVUzB3HxytbGLw7261AuFu/Kv8G4hB8lgPwSmZ68dbsUQs5WDYtS6hHqZi
9m7zks5Q4QJNg5zHSXkSKrtXS9qH1dpc9TVnB2B2wgw57bbj1kJrX1F/Qij4qtAaL8da
x6KUSKkXuN892C5CxrWjNEVTfX1mOJ0IAEWPXZlMyqmJVtOR4f6fi0vgM6Mc14emMcJj
j3GnJSC8+27/x2o2YK9zx4NVbecMNd12vgXIKyb8AYeMn+SoJUPRHB/9thNgHuITks9D
5NqSNdWV20CUCAQ8ETEeNndyIK89o6VUPp3f3FDWnwMjQtb/kqbv532hCi1sTOo+Ec8D
CJRQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.147.201 with SMTP id tm9mr32088443lbb.40.1435006283849;
Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T1KsOHF2u+Sk0c1d1U11ff-FJH9EjC4XNZP4-puWKE_Lg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T2HegqOBqd1jijk1bZBE6N+NH8x6nfwbaoLBACVf8-WBQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPswA9wVEs6oH8CxafLvLy78bpC937HZccjXHwyq8JVMV7qiQA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T1KsOHF2u+Sk0c1d1U11ff-FJH9EjC4XNZP4-puWKE_Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:51:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T0GqX72YqwSsXdPuWxe_4aAk1z1GJqV6jF+Vue5VWyTPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Kalle Rosenbaum <kalle@rosenbaum.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b34391acca5510519216f41
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:51:26 -0000
--047d7b34391acca5510519216f41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Excellent point. That could only happen if activation happened on 11 Jan
> 2016; instead of complicating the code and spec with another condition, I
> think it would be better to specify that the activation date is the later
> of the miner supermajority and 11 Jan, with the first big block two weeks
> later.
>
.... I take that back, I'm wrong and Tier is correct: if activation
happened right at midnight 11 Jan 2016 and the next block's timestamp was
before midnight, that next block would just be limited to 1MB in size.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
--047d7b34391acca5510519216f41
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On M=
on, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Gavin Andresen <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gavinandresen@gmail.c=
om</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"=
><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><span class=3D""><di=
v>Excellent point. That could only happen if activation happened on 11 Jan =
2016; instead of complicating the code and spec with another condition, I t=
hink it would be better to specify that the activation date is the later of=
the miner supermajority and 11 Jan, with the first big block two weeks lat=
er.<br></div></span><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><div></d=
iv></font></span></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_e=
xtra"><br></div>.... I take that back, I'm wrong and Tier is correct: i=
f activation happened right at midnight 11 Jan 2016 and the next block'=
s timestamp was before midnight, that next block would just be limited to 1=
MB in size.<div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">--<br>Gavin=
Andresen<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><br></div>
</div></div>
--047d7b34391acca5510519216f41--
|
