summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/49/dc9d66a861a75b39186425b0e5ea71acf7b35a
blob: 2ffd67f3fa8b4e17342b00820edbc608d1331489 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1X6eOo-0008VB-8Y
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:26:26 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.219.41 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.219.41; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-oa0-f41.google.com; 
Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1X6eOn-0006ty-4A
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:26:26 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j17so1249756oag.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 14 Jul 2014 04:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.63.3 with SMTP id c3mr17244130oes.16.1405337179660; Mon,
	14 Jul 2014 04:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.35.234 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 04:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53C3A8C0.5070608@googlemail.com>
References: <53C3A8C0.5070608@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:19 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FP8jmu_8uzoWdquZWpj4vWazUjA
Message-ID: <CANEZrP21sc9smev5tg07HnLpw-8WWS7EvzzTyEvD6qYEfHvpoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Krzysztof Okupski <k.okupski@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1d24262278904fe258fdc
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1X6eOn-0006ty-4A
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Protocol Specification
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:26:26 -0000

--001a11c1d24262278904fe258fdc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Nice work, but please don't call it the "Bitcoin protocol spec". Your
document is not a spec. It is an attempt to describe in English the Bitcoin
protocol, but anyone who implemented it based on your description would get
it wrong. For example you didn't mention the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug and many
other important areas like the difficulty transitions are also left
unspecified.

As a loose description of the protocol for newbies it's an invaluable
resource and perhaps we should link to it from the developer guide. As
something that claims to be a specification it is quite possibly dangerous
- the only spec that matters is the C++ original.


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Krzysztof Okupski <
k.okupski@googlemail.com> wrote:

>  Dear all,
>
> thank you for your invaluable feedback. As requested, the spec
> will from now on be under version control. It can be found under:
>
> https://github.com/minium/Bitcoin-Spec
>
> The old link to the PDF will be, just in case, kept updated as well.
>
>
> Warm greetings,
> Krzysztof Okupski
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
> search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck&#174;
> Code Sight&#153; - the same software that powers the world's largest code
> search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

--001a11c1d24262278904fe258fdc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Nice work, but please don&#39;t call it the &quot;Bitcoin =
protocol spec&quot;. Your document is not a spec. It is an attempt to descr=
ibe in English the Bitcoin protocol, but anyone who implemented it based on=
 your description would get it wrong. For example you didn&#39;t mention th=
e SIGHASH_SINGLE bug and many other important areas like the difficulty tra=
nsitions are also left unspecified.<div>
<br></div><div>As a loose description of the protocol for newbies it&#39;s =
an invaluable resource and perhaps we should link to it from the developer =
guide. As something that claims to be a specification it is quite possibly =
dangerous - the only spec that matters is the C++ original.</div>
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon,=
 Jul 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Krzysztof Okupski <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:k.okupski@googlemail.com" target=3D"_blank">k.okupski@googlemail=
.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
 =20

   =20
 =20
  <div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000">
    Dear all,<br>
    <br>
    thank you for your invaluable feedback. As requested, the spec<br>
    will from now on be under version control. It can be found under:<br>
    <br>
   =20
    <a href=3D"https://github.com/minium/Bitcoin-Spec" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tps://github.com/minium/Bitcoin-Spec</a><br>
    <br>
    The old link to the PDF will be, just in case, kept updated as well.<br=
>
    <br>
    <br>
    Warm greetings,<br>
    Krzysztof Okupski<br>
  </div>

<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and<br>
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck&amp;#174;=
<br>
Code Sight&amp;#153; - the same software that powers the world&#39;s larges=
t code<br>
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/b=
ds</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c1d24262278904fe258fdc--