summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/47/e536956e0901284c6c919565763d7d5034747e
blob: b04a3621e2efa54cc2e450191675e6a475dd215e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jgarzik@exmulti.com>) id 1Ud0Oj-0004uY-Lw
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 16 May 2013 15:47:17 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Ud0Of-0000qH-2m
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 16 May 2013 15:47:17 +0000
Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id 3so2459126pdj.13
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 16 May 2013 08:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references
	:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=R/bTxgdU7uIthQrHtZgRInWeIod7+wp/pqmvx3Y9gYA=;
	b=FFeEenF/5WUxEVzbcI/4cD/HhiOSn3uVaeMhrrCi9qT7xAu2WTktGwzGX8LcUWN3/O
	IWLIzYag5rDyhsSYKlAH9klSijPOex58go3Tu3NfKiLVVy83VZW2T5OwYXJH0nzQYnZs
	YykzGkKhtleu+zeRGKldJ+Gb39rhXz7c9lV4a0H5vm1vdJ8Qg/5FyaWvmsm3Dq6H/5CM
	gpd0/Rpnnhd5AC7AZBAEEMgFpN/lxYvplbv7eht1v6WaR+V8okkkUEXdbz1qKprjwfXG
	o+ZCBta7n5xPHL6M4XjsgB0aIZ2Gpdsc6fuBrz2pVUHYzzXXzo4EADLFsX5gzo13eErT
	xx2A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.197.165 with SMTP id iv5mr45107275pac.67.1368719227153;
	Thu, 16 May 2013 08:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.240.106 with HTTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [99.43.178.25]
In-Reply-To: <CALC81CNMTWhAQ8VSxToGcSPeJmfFJrANrdXONseTq1=WKm4=7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALC81CNMTWhAQ8VSxToGcSPeJmfFJrANrdXONseTq1=WKm4=7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:47:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+8xBpdY9Vi+K0Cxr_AJ25Y2ieB=0EueiPHq92pdr5QdBnNj_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
To: Ricardo Filipe <ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQ0/sjjCF40atMUPoPY+RtRYIETt5YA6JrVFfCvDjevcMYO0Ph7Nd8FQXtTzDFnDJC0sMU
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [209.85.192.182 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-Headers-End: 1Ud0Of-0000qH-2m
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Service bits for pruned nodes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:47:17 -0000

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Ricardo Filipe
<ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com> wrote:
> We would only end up with few copies of the historic data if users
> could choose what parts of the blockchain to store. Simply store
> chunks randomly, according to users available space, and give priority
> to the "N most recent" chunks to have more replicas in the network.
>
> You don't need bittorrent specifically for a DHT, if publicity is a
> problem. There are many DHT proposals and implementations, and i bet
> one of them should be more suitable to the bitcoin network than
> bittorrent's.

That's just about the worst thing you could do for bitcoin.  DoS one
part of the DHT, you DoS the entire blockchain by breaking the chain.

-- 
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com