summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/46/d2cb381ef9afafd2430ee52f9157723479696c
blob: 3acc4649cb608c9e441dbd55da53dff5bb503406 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
Return-Path: <hampus.sjoberg@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF2F4A6
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:49:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qt0-f175.google.com (mail-qt0-f175.google.com
	[209.85.216.175])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3976D19B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:49:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w1so137459803qtg.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=CRlx3bfu6/gTWBHJlU1yNZQGqVIY00Z4Nj6/ntCm7ZA=;
	b=PhXBdlxaENDWHcZC38VzR5ycTGSphiHKLulIprJWEEPjtcIbUzLQWQdjV+ijmz603x
	X+Zoy4XBz1qDboG1dfyyn/3V+PpRs61B0MwyOsgXOSWYRPxKZtQ0SPp7F/oYBhDZEE+/
	XXIf1YHn2sIT3NBPMiGm/N0VQQrfjM0gzEmnCOkGv9CM8Spdp+Jm/IJvQnHVazTw5eHn
	24dtpd9Obzf3Jf2i8NL/9Rt9KgR2H/DuqcY+DzR674jGgJqyoGOzDzWscJxy0wEj6SJg
	t+UhJhJsZy77Dyi02ixl26q62zSDzXWpSlxuMpjNmD76AWatIXPCO+9qzTxWCszQtYDt
	tDcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=CRlx3bfu6/gTWBHJlU1yNZQGqVIY00Z4Nj6/ntCm7ZA=;
	b=pLmDAvCwoAJh+DWB/lwR7u5XC2TKC1reoK7WY5jLo3yANQzj93GY7FcJXwJ4sYg/4V
	8YuGRl7S+EfDG8+yrV6zOSFwJRGqkjbVUgN/N3Kr2IN+I1hTGQoNe54V5RD23TilQtmc
	tmKjZyFzAkXB204YUduJoI0K0xl2eZywBXS/LqoaC4ZmEsIMFChAkCJ+na67+VcDT57I
	JTcj9TgojksC/8YUE7J9IsW6RXUh0BNkOQU+nwq561CP1WErc06ueVskOruPi0WhUkkB
	wT+E6n2Sbf9LjgCReDPQgMsSpt/QsL4jT+6mYQWjJfr/HCK4dTAD15mUOXpW+hk8i4Cl
	1Eyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz89Cld/zzx96iWqPKBMUb0CGzfSM7SNmg0ND11Xxo1vrwx6WWO
	YMVhaQDoEp4qLp3wNLJkfttiF+kfm7vpu4c=
X-Received: by 10.237.33.187 with SMTP id l56mr34745078qtc.165.1497977379443; 
	Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.155.140 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKgLtu-HUDuakk4DDU53nyChbQk_zY=f5OO2j1Za95PdL7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJowKgLtu-HUDuakk4DDU53nyChbQk_zY=f5OO2j1Za95PdL7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hampus_Sj=C3=B6berg?= <hampus.sjoberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:49:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFMkqK_OtZ=S5LFqERCYwSQCkbxdnWJq+wN-YM3CVkKWJx2SBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146ebf095c4810552670966"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Miners forced to run non-core code in order to
 get segwit activated
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:49:40 -0000

--001a1146ebf095c4810552670966
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I don't think it's a huge deal if the miners need to run a non-Core node
once the BIP91 deployment of Segwit2x happens. The shift will most likely
be temporary.

I agree that the "-bip148"-option should be merged, though.

2017-06-20 17:44 GMT+02:00 Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>:

> Are we going to merge BIP91 or a -BIP148 option to core for inclusion in
> the next release or so?
>
> Because a large percentage of miners are indifferent, right now miners
> have to choose between BIP148 and Segwit2x if they want to activate Segwit.
>
>
> Should we be forcing miners to choose to run non-core code in order to
> activate a popular feature?
>
> - Erik
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>

--001a1146ebf095c4810552670966
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I don&#39;t think it&#39;s a huge deal if the miners =
need to run a non-Core
 node once the BIP91 deployment of Segwit2x happens. The shift will most
 likely be temporary.<br><br></div>I agree that the &quot;-bip148&quot;-opt=
ion should be merged, though.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote">2017-06-20 17:44 GMT+02:00 Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span>:=
<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Are we going to merge B=
IP91 or a -BIP148 option to core for inclusion in the next release or so? =
=C2=A0 <br><br>Because a large percentage of miners are indifferent, right =
now miners have to choose between BIP148 and Segwit2x if they want to activ=
ate Segwit. =C2=A0 <br><br>Should we be forcing miners to choose to run non=
-core code in order to activate a popular feature?<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><f=
ont color=3D"#888888"><br><br>- Erik</font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1146ebf095c4810552670966--