summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/45/a596f14752b88a2262d9c4240debb7389c68b8
blob: a3d910c3e25af92ede957764910c670055b8a900 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
Return-Path: <marcopon@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F911120
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  4 Sep 2015 00:18:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.217.169])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA0F180
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri,  4 Sep 2015 00:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbmp1 with SMTP id mp1so2887200lbb.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=9XqgeX3v7A8h9Rw2P4HWQcSWJe+mNQrLiv8ZLTVi7ek=;
	b=fwG0ORPfTxDJ5XwMLouQPvtXDvUKXxl5PnH7BGSNsRqbhcbFpfXJRD22euvmuW2Xg2
	nm1lBNUOxVp+IpFdlKGXOtSLHehwcvEt7kGJs8I/TFTkF7iMDVHCiBvznh1L8ycrAyYC
	RqAO+kyH9NlSb+M2hcRvg9PVR1xUb35tr/hxwVSK6D+Q3gj60YIbaObiUoNpxYP1AUBW
	6zVpcAOaDi6ckQhem0A9QLYZQFqKCRiDOPqXnmv/sUEmGI8zb4jWOXTJ17SxpEvWeMo8
	NRKizZGj0JG8x/L41bXbeL+TyhfhvoBxoSb8nLhZmedJxa6fQsdHeC/8NCnzQrOZA6OV
	cp/A==
X-Received: by 10.152.5.68 with SMTP id q4mr709005laq.66.1441325886770; Thu,
	03 Sep 2015 17:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.186.168 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 17:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgR4iGshOgsammWQ93yD0GsckUgroX-sb7mDE7XuQb5k3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAS2fgR4iGshOgsammWQ93yD0GsckUgroX-sb7mDE7XuQb5k3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marco Pontello <marcopon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 02:17:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE0pACJ0nihnwXKovQ4mJb6+ctNdzfPu_RE=y1ThmyqCZd-8gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for
 request assignment
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:18:09 -0000

--089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

None that I can see.
In fact I was just about to ask for some details about this part of the
process, so this come just at the right time.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for
> storing and presenting BIPs.
>
> I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed
> to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using
> the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to
> request number assignment.
>
> Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable?
>
> (Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly
> directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different
> subject. Thanks!)
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>



-- 
Try the Online TrID File Identifier
http://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx

--089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">None that I can see.<div>In fact I was just about to ask f=
or some details about this part of the process, so this come just at the ri=
ght time.</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <span d=
ir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" tar=
get=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<=
br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left=
:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The process in BIP01 was written when we =
used a different solution for<br>
storing and presenting BIPs.<br>
<br>
I&#39;m thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed<b=
r>
to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using<br>
the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to<br>
request number assignment.<br>
<br>
Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable?<br>
<br>
(Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly<br>
directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different<br>
subject. Thanks!)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=
=3D"gmail_signature">Try the Online TrID File Identifier<br><a href=3D"http=
://mark0.net/onlinetrid.aspx" target=3D"_blank">http://mark0.net/onlinetrid=
.aspx</a></div>
</div>

--089e013d10047c9663051ee0d54f--