1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A6B7905
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 31 May 2017 01:22:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f181.google.com (mail-ua0-f181.google.com
[209.85.217.181])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBCA12A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 31 May 2017 01:22:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u10so1348178uaf.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 30 May 2017 18:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=Bged53+af4v1WgXbQ+OY3MlsdQRHcnH8ISNW4hugBgE=;
b=Doy9JXd+2D6Abb0FpZiQ6mODN5YyYuHcVuxMaE3wByCB19FOr4OmsnLXed2Mr6NEV2
s4foB1L3Uo/lX8LBDAAiLK3Lx7WerS4kiUCEmiD5PUll+RvNjtzLiEPaT16L0ZS8ORqm
RwAmK0LiFrqRaFRYLNFyatOJAeC6om4ATHGVzSt9Ll8IgRVswbAi6fvT+Aw72jIpuRqR
0Ot1e1WpSsxARQRsHp9wow6vK6WCM40L2mNr+N3QKfmCWd5iiP14jTnHHvvudaeiFmXJ
a0W5S/yf38eYcjfXH5mRmlCLljsoJLdaQ6VUKWhSws8wj3qAw6qDDbRnO4Pf863if8ws
5ajg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=Bged53+af4v1WgXbQ+OY3MlsdQRHcnH8ISNW4hugBgE=;
b=CrlTNhkFrTUc1p1iRJoGpNylKXR6kXpJo0Nqbyo7YhEomPuZHUa+G7jl5xY5ggIyiH
O70jLE7quv/ADkGjnRbbLqpcT+dzLv7wLvRgB72/YmmSYYX5vhDynKrvJO3+h4hcvchP
lbz7sawERJIlrjPY/87hXcE9D5gK9/+Nk9HIlYdWnWN/BK8xCK88Ny+vc/5k55ofuu9q
woZrikK5ptdLXmdDHK3IoI8nCva1MOsWFfGjM2RxNjIzTkCZ8/ZNlzPBV5btrjx/X293
xkmc18+JfArDgmx98pAwu+d9veD6+K0rz8qjf3Y9btEt0lRCe+V9do3hMYFNo9lV9zEp
bTZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCAf1doJasHlBJ4raQrbhMnGJLmMrPhuNBDsIju5RFJsO2b0B3+
OXxPY8WVtZpBeHe9YxtDYxnAqhQ4U5Ua
X-Received: by 10.176.1.196 with SMTP id 62mr12615048ual.77.1496193765052;
Tue, 30 May 2017 18:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.52.213 with HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2017 18:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH+Axy5yYQywpy0s9pBZt_fNoLPpWfra-cU9HrUwH71GDOchsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201705232023.40588.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAJowKgJK9zBkVAM1NyOsjU04gvwV3zGnk+1ebfpt6rnbiKy6Og@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDpet31gEcBY6NTxEG+xA4rvg8_c79L+J=mJySGbf7Ydbg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOG=w-uei5-c-Mpp_R6RrN29NTrSV+gpNd79FC3cB6QPG65sEw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAH+Axy5yYQywpy0s9pBZt_fNoLPpWfra-cU9HrUwH71GDOchsQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 03:22:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDoJ7S3pjdjdbKZ4-EuVXnEOj-gEPzSEvUGdtYovZaNK=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: James MacWhyte <macwhyte@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hypothetical 2 MB hardfork to follow BIP148
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 01:22:46 -0000
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:50 AM, James MacWhyte <macwhyte@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The 1MB classic block size prevents quadratic hashing
>> problems from being any worse than they are today.
>>
>
> Add a transaction-size limit of, say, 10kb and the quadratic hashing problem
> is a non-issue. Donezo.
Why is it https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1661
not enough at this point?
Why the need for a transaction size limit?
|
