summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/44/50d4d26754eaa2848e2dfecd2903f51efc7041
blob: 59dd5212620b0bbd4f2607280422455bb80c835b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7A15308
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5880510E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:18:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DD2438A4C62;
	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151015:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::8CYDD8z0jHBWwVa9:efPof
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151015:jgarzik@gmail.com::jXy27WlcR5svpoMY:nWnm
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:17:34 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.6-gentoo; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
References: <CADm_WcYnq5sk=wdhqx5UysyS=fu7kRUrixOJC=QfoY5np1ATmA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcYnq5sk=wdhqx5UysyS=fu7kRUrixOJC=QfoY5np1ATmA@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201510150017.37007.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed list moderation policy and conduct
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:18:13 -0000

On Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:02:21 AM Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 2. If someone asks for help it is because they need it. Politely suggest
> specific documentation or more appropriate venues where appropriate. Avoid
> aggressive or vague responses.

This could get noisy. Clarification that only *development* help is=20
appropriate for the list would improve it.

> 2. Conversations should remain focused and on-topic. If you must change t=
he
> topic, start a new thread by changing the topic line of your emails.

Probably should note that entirely new threads should be new messages, *not=
*=20
merely a reply with a changed topic (as changing the topic does not in fact=
=20
start a new thread).

> 4. Off-topic threads will be directed to other venues.

Threads like this one are off-topic, yet we have no obvious other venue for=
=20
it.. :(

> *Disclose potential conflicts*

IMO this seems like not only a waste of time, but also futile for anyone no=
t=20
exclusively associated with a single company/organization.

> If you have concerns about someone=E2=80=99s conduct:
> * *On-list*: discussing conduct on-list, either as part of another message
> or as a standalone thread, is always acceptable.

Please no. This is off-topic noise.

Luke