summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/44/41d10d96d62cc0c2cc054187cd2d463cc31622
blob: 1044fec8aa0196b9355bc01282e75ccf3b65a997 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1WI483-00069c-Sh
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:36:03 +0000
Received: from mail-yh0-f50.google.com ([209.85.213.50])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WI482-00072R-LJ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:36:03 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 29so6114354yhl.37
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
	:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=CTchEv5JFWhH2U4fJcHsuyqstwPVhLXDISA68VVsYVM=;
	b=fgl3XaPnJvtzkZ8jhNT17mDogqqQ1GET0TrAdZ3xO8QYu1NtI1Lbx8I9GRJSRcEeFW
	QTMccktE6oQBVwqkEqBHyfLHIDCVZb4JKpsIu3xXoNqB2FDTnuB8S8SX1s+WlJ1KjjfL
	PPMOZUSsmkyC6VJ+XMeN91j++oSRsMe8nRXTgPma3EoRAlFR+JetVaRo/+TGcu51nNM7
	ZQ/Xh4jAtdu9d0AvsBq0QOUCWBLWjID6hJWZLZxWSMOp2kCnE7s5QHrzJ+YuN+Ot5PXY
	FED0w5PKoPeRgiehoAM4hvb1SEWzo25/LBkBGyLlnSiF0IZcYm3Cms+9WZVvq+vZWo8R
	QIUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlkazpbMSJmucYuTEqITC/HJA8392N+FnhXXPHz1h0Z63tE1RcAtX20OpPSkJIJXEtJAhn5
X-Received: by 10.236.88.75 with SMTP id z51mr1397269yhe.109.1393281357109;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.127.233]
	(108-193-6-130.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.193.6.130])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b24sm1929646yhl.25.2014.02.24.14.35.56
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <530BC94D.3030301@monetize.io>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:35:57 -0800
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <449F9E79-7B1B-4821-93C3-F1DC1B5B1DEA@bitsofproof.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WI482-00072R-LJ
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On OP_RETURN in upcoming 0.9
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:36:04 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

OP_RETURN outputs are provably unspendable *and* not included in the
UTXO set, so they're not dust (the client makes this check and handles
TX_NULL_DATA outputs separately).

On 02/24/2014 10:13 AM, Tamas Blummer wrote:
> It costs at least 5430 satoshis to create an output at the moment.
>  Is the same spam limit applied if the script is OP_RETURN? If not,
> I would be concerned od opening a cheap spam.
> 
> Tamas Blummer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=6Jux
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----