1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Return-Path: <bitcoin@upalc.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF47892B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:30:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pg0-f41.google.com (mail-pg0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71CC5285
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Jun 2017 20:30:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a70so18072527pge.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=upalc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=ppqfITNt2hgs3uJjV6ufbLemjXfpGNVr5x2VAHeHztA=;
b=UJ2xn0bSEOSHUbQqpDcH1E98vPB+7tTN+VevhSo95SIfWe1julP1vcmSg6m43GSAKY
U2aaQ6cmcOIOPUbSbYb7HkII4GgKKs5cod6macgdqs1NMvYcqTyA7KhR+9EC0aAXrh2G
iHgoWDC9AghxuF81QwtqJS9lw3jNY+IMw+YSgAZ3GAY2piOxb4dMOVT0Zd7ettfbFx5Z
6jozfmG05wQEeQAGnBPKxe5KiCGrcB5jT8yCoSBKcGEYYl7xJNHsv6ZOOr7DBAxsLM+4
LduOLbupZlacwgT8Td+N2FZuQq7riDlEr1dxCk+N72PXPtj2YHhfxv2wjuzIoonrudPj
ffrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=ppqfITNt2hgs3uJjV6ufbLemjXfpGNVr5x2VAHeHztA=;
b=R+pHEC0EyzHrs171UVtgpEslgBmHbsAQo9iCD2RSdbwWAhICpdniClPOl8ZWXDO2Qt
rJmtDgQr1d1bnABMipAElifH8Tgs7VD+gfNe0+7pjXCRjLfWJ9M+CCDji6W3uhwuVzR1
Ng3VbE+K6SzCrPcurYU6l1O7NJ4nmUG8QUH3B2BucJU8DcqjRZf61y0hZeiOvhpL1ktT
iM2ajrYIwOI+4XWB3xRpTNJCDIW2GmO/z/iv9wTwsQJ4cMcXFPh9qKAcBp43ZVQmlv6X
FjPIyWY2yKhD6Rh6yhF1YVbFQ32PnAbBtDMwM+XFtC/1LtUf09N7KX3CTK0NB8/Q0qq0
WZNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcC2V7MlpGEGjqLvZrv5Tq4m0hMTu9uT8i9whQXao4nqZxJ9qI/N
ZANBOzPsTN2pZgDRBvkWHBpO8+MWFPgVctajAg==
X-Received: by 10.84.184.12 with SMTP id l12mr17672660plc.9.1496694623718;
Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.187.196 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [103.77.138.250]
From: Upal Chakraborty <bitcoin@upalc.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 02:00:23 +0530
Message-ID: <CAED3CWg-Ss_4q6WzRh3ue+NP69Z8-xTztQw-=gO9Pc_j+pGiVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c14268e62683f05513c5fec"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 11:42:58 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] SegWit activation proposal with 2MB Hard Fork by next
Block Halving on 2020
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:30:25 -0000
--94eb2c14268e62683f05513c5fec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
*Proposal*: Verify whether 50% Tx mined from SegWit activation block to
block 630000 are SegWit Tx. If yes, increase legacy max block size to 2MB
and SegWit max block size to 8MB.
*Implementation*: This proposal either needs to be implemented in next
release of Bitcoin Core or require SegWit activation period restart while
it is implemented & released.
*Rationale*: This proposal minimizes the chance of a chain split, while
sticking to the original bitcoin scaling roadmap, i.e.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011865.html
Thanks & Regards,
Upal Chakraborty
--94eb2c14268e62683f05513c5fec
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><b>Proposal</b>: Verify whether 50% Tx mined from Seg=
Wit activation block to block 630000 are SegWit Tx. If yes, increase legacy=
max block size to 2MB and SegWit max block size to 8MB.<br></div><div><br>=
</div><div><b>Implementation</b>: This proposal either needs to be implemen=
ted in next release of Bitcoin Core or require SegWit activation period res=
tart while it is implemented & released.=C2=A0<br></div><div><br></div>=
<div><b>Rationale</b>: This proposal minimizes the chance of a chain split,=
while sticking to the original bitcoin scaling roadmap, i.e.=C2=A0<a href=
=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/0=
11865.html">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-De=
cember/011865.html</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks &=
Regards,</div><div>Upal Chakraborty</div></div>
--94eb2c14268e62683f05513c5fec--
|
