1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>) id 1X42oo-00028H-V4
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 07 Jul 2014 06:54:30 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of riseup.net
designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender)
client-ip=198.252.153.129;
envelope-from=odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net;
helo=mx1.riseup.net;
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1X42on-0004ra-78
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 07 Jul 2014 06:54:30 +0000
Received: from fruiteater.riseup.net (fruiteater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.74])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D014ACDC;
Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla@fruiteater.riseup.net)
with ESMTPSA id EF14EE63
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
(SquirrelMail authenticated user odinn.cyberguerrilla)
by fruiteater.riseup.net with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:54:23 -0700
Message-ID: <482f7271864acb611912b0ed901ad601.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJDPnz-JYbhTZw2cLVb1QrerrHVim9GRBdgVPsOeTLFJ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+s+GJDSPS=zsM64wHaG1CucHVkO==L1QkHYiciUo9iJ-RADng@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJAei15doCg-h2BK6tEvfwy5m5YHPhg_+8b=G4ew41Mqjw@mail.gmail.com>
<4f55608991d5377117ecf1728cd8db0c.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net>
<CA+s+GJDPnz-JYbhTZw2cLVb1QrerrHVim9GRBdgVPsOeTLFJ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 23:54:23 -0700
From: "Odinn Cyberguerrilla" <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
To: "Wladimir" <laanwj@gmail.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines
X-Headers-End: 1X42on-0004ra-78
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 06:54:31 -0000
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Odinn Cyberguerrilla
> <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote:
>> Wait, I thought SOCKS4 was supposed to help somehow in terms of
>> prevention
>> of leaking of information?
>
> SOCKS4a (unlike SOCKS4) supports doing DNS lookups on the server, but
> it is not supported by bitcoin core. So it is not part of this
> discussion.
>
> And SOCKS5 can do all of that just as well. But if you feel like
> contributing SOCKS4a support that's fine with me.
>
> Wladimir
>
OK, thanks Wladimir.
|
