1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
|
Return-Path: <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 284EC91A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:22:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83750174
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:22:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8835BE5B3;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:26:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz
Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id a1-sjF5oZvcq; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:26:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0A7EE379;
Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:26:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch>
<342485b4-586d-c753-94b6-999d5fc14e46@satoshilabs.com>
<57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch>
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Message-ID: <0e9cd5e4-eba0-4dd3-7e8f-258c899cd66f@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:21:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:22:07 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Gn8ldchnTqlr8E6Vo17wHcxk29pv21DR4"
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
To: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <0e9cd5e4-eba0-4dd3-7e8f-258c899cd66f@satoshilabs.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hardware Wallet Standard
References: <57B31EBC.1030806@jonasschnelli.ch>
<342485b4-586d-c753-94b6-999d5fc14e46@satoshilabs.com>
<57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch>
In-Reply-To: <57B32D9D.8080908@jonasschnelli.ch>
--Gn8ldchnTqlr8E6Vo17wHcxk29pv21DR4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 16/08/16 17:13, Jonas Schnelli wrote:
> I'm aware of this approach but I don't think this makes sense long term=
=2E
> We need a better way on the protocol level to validate inputs amounts
> (where segwit is a first step towards this).
So you basically rephrased what I am saying but in another words.
> I think we should collaborate together and work out a standard.
I am for it. I am just saying we should create a standard for new forms
of transactions (Segwit and maybe Lightning), not the current "ugly" ones=
=2E
--=20
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol "stick" Rusnak
SatoshiLabs.com
--Gn8ldchnTqlr8E6Vo17wHcxk29pv21DR4--
--eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=Rt48
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--eVg8c0O2rE62w0SBaTpGFmNACDwjNoQqg--
|
