1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1RjfQ1-0007VF-0s
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:11:21 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm2-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.162])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1RjfQ0-0007qT-6B for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:11:20 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
07 Jan 2012 23:11:15 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.234] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
07 Jan 2012 23:11:15 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1049.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
07 Jan 2012 23:11:15 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 9174.94627.bm@omp1049.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 79357 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2012 23:11:14 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: MMSRNU8VM1lWO1jzzdxYRk4oP8rSB19ppvb5GZtIRVHxDk9
TXrA.fXslhj.LgRkMAVUEei96Pz8RpIDYtNHUsPk__9hgeC8bw89maKSiFXn
t.bl51sOt.lkGmthSZlMcIPqWL8AMiasVU0iVMIRpcw_Jwq9pZOXGOjHrTz0
jX4DmX5qq3EzD9kGdnYWAEMa9KyTM3b9wfWMSTU512EbfOd2g4PFshcAmekF
rqIqjzkacCbtEyLDZkZxv11Q4L480d2iDZVX9AiLljeeweOWXFeDEisjgAgQ
rDhnCKdnjDQtiq0JUd8ddRpcDiky8lTwVy5oEdlV.sRADFXopsDksqcRfvbY
TmJCQfTwK91elaXSwINe87F6CGMFbwZ_yHWJ6gr.y4yYH8_lTS8F4JNIzKny
rs1zFSpVkpPr8OKW6ms4kWWQpXHAJ4LTFiz_zqJw1t9QxoFNQNKbFYTI1RAo
_.BdNp63DRazDypg7mn_k_H_yANCS97oSaXop99CbOVZKqXFznK1bBQ9nTjo
4_rsIQ_Kz0EIPPRES
Received: from [92.20.155.29] by web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:11:14 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698
References: <1325956875.73286.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<CABsx9T00=X+0-59+pQN6MqAox8hnqm-08gr2GA=QWfqe_qSF5g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1325977874.57604.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:11:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T00=X+0-59+pQN6MqAox8hnqm-08gr2GA=QWfqe_qSF5g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.91.162 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1RjfQ0-0007qT-6B
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Pull 748 pay to script hash
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 23:11:21 -0000
OK, here is one thing:=0A=0Awhat is the purpose behind counting the number =
of sig ops after you have executed the script in ConnectInputs?=0ASeems lik=
e it would be too late then.=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0AFrom=
: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>=0ATo: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.=
com>=0ACc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>=0ASent: =
Saturday, January 7, 2012 10:48 PM=0ASubject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Pul=
l 748 pay to script hash=0A=0A> It might be better for code review if the o=
ld pull is reverted and then this one re-requested. That will make it easie=
r=0A> to see the real changes.=0A=0AI count the 1 major merge then 8 commit=
s to fix bugs or tweak=0Athings...=A0 I just tried reverting them and stopp=
ed when I got scared=0AI'll accidentally revert a fix we do want to keep.=
=0A=0AInstead, I updated my gavinandresen/master github branch to the state=
=0Aof the tree just before the OP_EVAL merge, so for code review purposes=
=0Ayou can look at:=0A=0Ahttps://github.com/gavinandresen/bitcoin-git/compa=
re/master...pay_to_script_hash=0A=0AThere are unrelated 0.6 pulls in those =
changes, too, but it should be=0Apretty obvious what is what.=0A=0A-- =0A--=
=0AGavin Andresen=0A
|
