summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/41/ead091b4d489935937b14544d522da73189764
blob: bc0ae0df7bca2859824d68a3b935ebecdfc49d7a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1R02ge-0008KW-3H
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:43:56 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=173.246.101.161;
	envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; 
Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me)
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1R02gd-0005JL-2E for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:43:56 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (dhcp04346.highsouth-resnet.unc.edu
	[152.23.97.28])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD9BCBB3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun,  4 Sep 2011 04:43:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T1juB-0hr9NW=PoO5eh_Aqhzkiv3tnXTSTsjBKiy4y0JA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T1juB-0hr9NW=PoO5eh_Aqhzkiv3tnXTSTsjBKiy4y0JA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 22:43:48 -0400
Message-ID: <1315104228.4816.1.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1R02gd-0005JL-2E
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.4rc1 known bugs
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:43:56 -0000

On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 20:13 -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Quick status update on 0.4; I probably won't have time to tackle these
> properly before Tuesday:
> 
> + sipa found what looks like a deadlock between the addr-handling and
> IRC-join-handling code.
> + UukGoblin reports a deadlock problem on a bitcoind handling getwork requests.
> 
> If you want to get more familiar with the bitcoin code and you have a
> lot of patience, tracking down deadlocks a great way to do it.
> 
> + ArtForz found a performance bug with transactions that have
> thousands of inputs and outputs on the solidcoin test network.
>  (not as big an issue for bitcoin due to fees being based on
> transaction size, but still worrying)
> 
+ (my fault) Gitian doesnt build properly.