1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D09798A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.82])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF571A6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c245.authsmtp.com (mail-c245.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.245])
by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8RLFsMR001918;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:15:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8RLFpw1045086
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 22:15:52 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E47AB4011D;
Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 341B9205E4; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:15:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:15:50 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu>
Message-ID: <20170927211550.GA2034@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <20170927160654.GA12492@savin.petertodd.org>
<CAAcC9yvdw4Yphs-prpckaouzaU21D=kGRqK+gG9SbPr-=27z9w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAcC9yvdw4Yphs-prpckaouzaU21D=kGRqK+gG9SbPr-=27z9w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 0b043e63-a3c9-11e7-801f-9cb654bb2504
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAUUC1AEAgsB AmEbWVZeUVh7XGE7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUg0KfWpB QR8eVhxyfwMIfHpy ZwhiDHBfXxF8dlss
QR1dCGwHMGB9YGAe Bl1RJFFSdQcYLB1A alQxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXAShZ WAwWNhofUV4KBDcg RhcEVSkuGEAeDz4z
KAEiJhYWEQ4YPkk/ PRM9XhoyEidXU1IF dwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1039:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to
BIP-173
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:15:57 -0000
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 01:35:33PM -0600, Chris Priest wrote:
> A better solution is to just have the sending wallet check to see if the
> address you are about to send to has been used before. If it's a fresh
My concern is not primarily people re-using addresses, but rather people us=
ing
stale addresses that the recipient would rather not be used anymore. This
situation often happens even if the stale address has never been used.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZzBUBAAoJECSBQD2l8JH7baEIAKcV9M/nK9iqKPynbLRbumWA
iVpopa4o3xtEvQAZHaiZqziOVjO1Yb7htY0jzjYBJKfvZsIZeKWHel9d35/GUpZf
ufEgmgCj1XA0kASWJZxOSn+echoC6Jc2cMRCnZ3ZsAzUZEevBh7H/hKmq1hrAC8p
Um6ICsPL6tYcjGpC2uKeIsFluRBIXyg9WLuQMoOQFugAEVq1Kra31ZGvc65TYAID
q0o4zOt6gCDDyfMx7qcKr/WG/xwxYG0a2c7nVhAoJrEzm0KMinj2eH0lq25WscPp
oOlpHbPlw432W9ivvhquJ2l1dMg1E3G8USBqomDqZMl8/LjzE7ZHzeqWLWqj0xY=
=SiXd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--
|
