summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/41/81127ecd1194f9a168d469f7ae093f502a1ba2
blob: 82e14f3202136331461f9c279a4dc9033d0e14e6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
Return-Path: <miron@hyper.to>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B77C002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:09:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3E1410E5
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:09:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 4F3E1410E5
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.651
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id qALv--_thdeC
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org AC16D410B2
Received: from mail-oa1-f48.google.com (mail-oa1-f48.google.com
 [209.85.160.48])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC16D410B2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa1-f48.google.com with SMTP id
 586e51a60fabf-127ba06d03fso46442705fac.3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2022 01:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date;
 bh=6kg8lycvb0YQstZh2UTcIvLD7XgN8U1U/hT36H+s1tM=;
 b=fLMy91vaWu1J8li0D/pYke/YntDvjqYAqhVe5CIwidFsLL06rY7NxOlUhLEn9m/m+O
 +/qFavNQDrql0d106WYS6X23DdWEB2fbXpE9kfcjU+sPgtlWypcYZWHhWvq0PMYmqJBw
 w3W9/1nheSFa+MChZiC8Ocyyrwh/0MBeAZRprIe8kgWHK6leFBh6mVQyPY8sD1692d5C
 p4M5aNnD4hI8fvKJ963HClJwuhB0jooae5pI2ZcKJOgQ9+vKvk6Q1goctT5tSljhilA7
 Lcoe71ychvazSYiirSVEw5WL3ChGmDZjG7RN6ydOAiArUfpY1UgLgr8yFva2JGtYTm7U
 MzqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3M2VsO0kv7X8W10in/B5p/bENeZimEnkQMeRVYcTeQqQSV4I32
 h+hVI3lTEhWRw+y9LwiRghTo1tYgdy/SGhHZiJ00kg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7YxiE5Ja3i5MYFhDaprg1KuMXlmPGKSxc2ukKf2E1gCVGSZ/P05IzZV5gghhwLnoOnTjX5IknjSGq3rbJJQ+g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:41cf:b0:118:7eb8:4875 with SMTP id
 z15-20020a05687041cf00b001187eb84875mr4574659oac.181.1663229393431; Thu, 15
 Sep 2022 01:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BQjnkZZajHKYBOUFAin8toHgNHhG346VUR4GQx6bSi2ftOuNTK1c1d4LWN4Zmr0tUg2w3xgtIZJSphBORYgWw4PPXq5pGFoZJk2Lx6AokuQ=@protonmail.com>
 <CAMnpzfo-LZO5h2HE0Hwt7BxejJk-ZBKvKT0yjgdz92CHLOXm7A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMnpzfo-LZO5h2HE0Hwt7BxejJk-ZBKvKT0yjgdz92CHLOXm7A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Devrandom <c1.bitcoin@niftybox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:05:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAB0O3SWsjuQ+gc+QPcqnKQWFO=aXYsUm+TSfjiXFvi+diUtUMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev@rgrant.org>, 
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002d036d05e8b2c5cf"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:37:22 +0000
Cc: Buck O Perley <buck.perley@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] On a new community process to specify covenants
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:09:56 -0000

--0000000000002d036d05e8b2c5cf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:03 PM Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 2:47 AM Buck O Perley via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> First just wanted to thank you
> for taking the initiative to
> > put this together. I think that as the community and
> > ecosystem continue to grow, it's going to be an important
> > part of the process to have groups like this develop. Hopefully
> > they allow us to resist the "Tyranny of Structurelessness" without
> > resorting to formalized governance processes and systems.
>
> Huh, lots of reading material behind that phrase.  I'd heard it
> before, but hadn't looked it up.
>
> > > Defining a communication channel is still an open question: IRC, Slack,
> > Discord, Discourse, ...
> >
> > I would vote against Slack. IRC is probably the best but maybe too
> > high a barrier to entry? Publishing logs at least would counter
> > concerns of it being exclusive. Maybe discord as an alternative.
>
> I found Discord immediately wanted a phone number from me.  I think
> IRC remains the lowest bar for participants to contribute.
>
>
Agreed, anything that requires a phone number makes it difficult to be
pseudonymous.

I recommend Matrix, since it doesn't require any privacy invasive
information and has e2ee by default for 1-1 conversations.

The Matrix room could optionally bridge to IRC if there is a significant
demand for that.

--0000000000002d036d05e8b2c5cf
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 6:03 PM Ryan Gran=
t via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.o=
rg">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px=
 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Mon,=
 Sep 12, 2022 at 2:47 AM Buck O Perley via bitcoin-dev<br>
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; First just wanted to than=
k you<br>
for taking the initiative to<br>
&gt; put this together. I think that as the community and<br>
&gt; ecosystem continue to grow, it&#39;s going to be an important<br>
&gt; part of the process to have groups like this develop. Hopefully<br>
&gt; they allow us to resist the &quot;Tyranny of Structurelessness&quot; w=
ithout<br>
&gt; resorting to formalized governance processes and systems.<br>
<br>
Huh, lots of reading material behind that phrase.=C2=A0 I&#39;d heard it<br=
>
before, but hadn&#39;t looked it up.<br>
<br>
&gt; &gt; Defining a communication channel is still an open question: IRC, =
Slack,<br>
&gt; Discord, Discourse, ...<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I would vote against Slack. IRC is probably the best but maybe too<br>
&gt; high a barrier to entry? Publishing logs at least would counter<br>
&gt; concerns of it being exclusive. Maybe discord as an alternative.<br>
<br>
I found Discord immediately wanted a phone number from me.=C2=A0 I think<br=
>
IRC remains the lowest bar for participants to contribute.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agreed, anything that requires a phone=
 number makes it difficult to be pseudonymous.<br></div><div><br></div><div=
>I recommend Matrix, since it doesn&#39;t require any privacy invasive info=
rmation and has e2ee by default for 1-1 conversations. <br></div><div><br><=
/div><div>The Matrix room could optionally bridge to IRC if there is a sign=
ificant demand for that. <br></div><div><br></div></div></div>

--0000000000002d036d05e8b2c5cf--