1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Return-Path: <bram@bittorrent.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D412AB90
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Feb 2017 03:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com (mail-it0-f52.google.com
[209.85.214.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6F71D2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Feb 2017 03:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 203so7561507ith.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:02:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=bittorrent-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=XvuuXEdYs94unoWRaZ4V8+ANDF4aIyZD/B/YugB5RjE=;
b=vHuahANwGqRBaboBO9aQ7um+N/XRxy6ngdeVusnlsfc80t/Ix2IxVw2cL6xuVBFMM5
SjoTfKh2W3+kRYb6uU/3XffIrDD20zYHriuzooZ+mUGbtb28UTN83mnLvcOPI/bKc/aK
k6uKJ3ZfEa+ubOtHMaYl6IxZ+WcVWtXldLvHRk8xV5cFiHV/XSMBjXQOttADaGhSJJf4
1X0hxU+ivijC23jILW+Rycxw24itB2RyK9dN+BIOMW/0Ei/5wT3txeqob18d2Ngmrjk1
+9sPSzrtcDeRe22ueTiwg9ppBsxOI7z1dkl4N22RoAK+jOhpB4V9cpI6T+7UJ2GOWi1M
NOcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=XvuuXEdYs94unoWRaZ4V8+ANDF4aIyZD/B/YugB5RjE=;
b=RKuQ+FaQP8d+I20iVu65okUF0eAm2GcKrNWDlYF3ZgF1MK1KG8rdIcvbyopuU7y3Gy
C+zIRFvKjWtTz694/b+j3vfLEklVQcLQySaSUYgDS76UUWLAjOjMU2dOrnNL2wPbeQGA
33NVu0PRnKT7vtiajLJC6O2iXALNmw8q/aHp4UJ6V2K1bxaeESC0ohw4qozLklwEay6f
ek8vqp4aPb2KZpTv+PsW/tCR1A+MaBduN2oDVO6fMaqTmxZJ6PneaVh34zttrHfLhY7b
VZg2GxdKm18n1CIabv+Nn3uVzfI8zb/8ntywyJ+ZoqAc8Nv8PwVWQcn0YoPLmVblAI0r
CzGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nyEGzSj2xmW1rWUn/Y98MoG7MfhAvKL9B0/MIIio/AlqyIDw/faiQLsPQd+REOlaMhGyMCWRfH2DB9Tr+0
X-Received: by 10.36.71.207 with SMTP id t198mr732456itb.98.1487905356671;
Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:02:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.73.150 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:02:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170224025811.GA31911@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <20170223011506.GC905@savin.petertodd.org>
<CAAcC9ys5sUxVfOjogFiF3gzk51D_L=QQkOYevTH=qbh_RkA3Hw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+KqGkrUneGe4yORi=JAAWzoO0UftMUuJm3S-__W5sBh-+T1vQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20170223235105.GA28497@savin.petertodd.org>
<CA+KqGkowxEZeAFYa2JJchBDtRkg1p3YZNocivzu3fAtgRLDRBQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20170224010943.GA29218@savin.petertodd.org>
<CA+KqGkrOK76S3ffPJmpqYcBwtSeKESqN16yZsrwzDR6JZZmwFA@mail.gmail.com>
<20170224025811.GA31911@savin.petertodd.org>
From: Bram Cohen <bram@bittorrent.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:02:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+KqGkq7gavAnAk-tcA+gxL2sWpv3ENhEmHrQHaPdyAsKrLjGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145b6643ea69505493df695
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Better MMR Definition
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 03:02:38 -0000
--001a1145b6643ea69505493df695
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
>
> So to be clear, do you agree or disagree with me that you *can* extract a
> compact proof from a MMR that a given output is unspent?
>
After wading through your logic on how updates are done, I agree that that
can be done, but apples to apples compact proofs can also be done in a utxo
commitment, and proofs of the validity of updates can be done in a utxo
commitment, so there isn't any performance advantage to all that extra
complexity.
--001a1145b6643ea69505493df695
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
hu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Peter Todd <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"ma=
ilto:pete@petertodd.org" target=3D"_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>></span=
> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo=
rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=
=3D"h5"><br></div></div>So to be clear, do you agree or disagree with me th=
at you *can* extract a<br>
compact proof from a MMR that a given output is unspent?<br></blockquote><d=
iv><br></div><div>After wading through your logic on how updates are done, =
I agree that that can be done, but apples to apples compact proofs can also=
be done in a utxo commitment, and proofs of the validity of updates can be=
done in a utxo commitment, so there isn't any performance advantage to=
all that extra complexity.</div></div></div></div>
--001a1145b6643ea69505493df695--
|
