1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
|
Return-Path: <thomasv@electrum.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D9FD899
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:33:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 06:07:43 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net
[217.70.183.194])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DC51F0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:33:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Originating-IP: 178.19.221.38
Received: from [10.10.42.98] (unknown [178.19.221.38])
(Authenticated sender: thomasv@electrum.org)
by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDBB3C5A6A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:33:01 +0200 (CEST)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CABuOfuiz9U=ZPWRUfVXHgBekZ74B4zkUikg6Svxbr6jrJA5Vyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv@electrum.org>
Message-ID: <28d57503-c2b3-7736-bfea-46506636d999@electrum.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:33:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABuOfuiz9U=ZPWRUfVXHgBekZ74B4zkUikg6Svxbr6jrJA5Vyw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP49 Derivation scheme changes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:33:04 -0000
On 05.09.2017 09:10, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Thomas. The procedure described in
> http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/seedphrase.html is really what I was
> looking for ! I really don't see any point of following BIP49, If possible
> it would be great if you can propose an alternative to BIP49 that follows
> similar structure to what is used in electrum.
>
> I have proposed following changes to BIP32 serialization format
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki#serialization-format
> to differentiate segwit xpub/xprv. Below the list of new version bytes,
> resulting base58 prefix and network type:
>
> 0x042393df , sxpr , segwit mainnet private key
> 0x04239377 , sxpb , segwit mainnet public key
> 0x04222463 , stpb , segwit testnet public key
> 0x042224cc , stpr , segwit testnet private key
>
I have proposed a similar idea, with letters z,y,z combined with pub/prv
(see the electrum documentation page)
The point is that we need 3 types of keys, not 2, because there are two
types of segwit output scripts: native and nested in p2sh.
We could use t,u,v for testnet.
|
