1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
Return-Path: <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA4DC000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:31:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 251B7403DB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:31:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mattcorallo.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with UTF8SMTP id eHTyZEc5B4Qh
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail.as397444.net (mail.as397444.net [69.59.18.99])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id AD053403D6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.as397444.net (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 728F65536A9;
Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:31:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-DKIM-Note: Keys used to sign are likely public at https://as397444.net/dkim/
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mattcorallo.com;
s=1619384464; t=1619386310;
bh=aMc1tHMw63TPQjiWZxqvh1Un37jNhuSrSPYKvS8tEjg=;
h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
b=maMM6/ICyBBRF56+gWMEN+coYkFib8mzA6MYJJQRVIeBcSYINf55jc2w1v+WALT1r
Sn3iMSuOfEPLLeOqZirKcTA7P2udNuEaxtCT8FtnjSa5PpjtYXTJRtzX+YivKXbEwx
CyT+qJtb5LpZsRN4frps0oad8xI8PV3KLGhWnRF2c5PVB5jPsguPnbxokpR8XzflUV
D9+yDWmBTBZQ9nzJG6Iux7f224PfGLBJz9j8wgG5KhYaOh55jCM9vliLoKrOTmPgVs
GSob+hyfqfLLt0lpwV1QoiQKM5tzi5ncBpPMvEbwf1m1/aA2us0+ty3W4oTwvG1uam
KJGowwe4SzZcw==
Message-ID: <248f871e-1b83-8c7c-678b-3ed0585a6357@mattcorallo.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 17:31:50 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
References: <202104230209.05373.luke@dashjr.org>
<202104252100.07296.luke@dashjr.org>
<40214e32-ffb3-9518-7bc8-9c1059f50da7@mattcorallo.com>
<202104252122.40909.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
In-Reply-To: <202104252122.40909.luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:31:54 -0000
Alright, let's see...
Sorting by most recently updated...
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-asc+updated%3A%3E2021-01-01
#1104 has been updated nearly daily for the past many weeks. You commented 12 days ago saying "Concept NACK" (which
isn't a thing on BIPs - huh? they're author documents, as you're well aware), and nothing further.
#1105 which is less recently updated by one on the above list has a comment from you 19 hours ago.
I'm really not sure what playing dumb gets you, here. Its really transparent and isn't helpful in any way to anything.
In general, I think its time we all agree the BIP process has simply failed and move on. Luckily its not really all that
critical and proposed protocol documents can be placed nearly anywhere with the same effect.
Matt
On 4/25/21 17:22, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> On Sunday 25 April 2021 21:14:08 Matt Corallo wrote:
>> On 4/25/21 17:00, Luke Dashjr wrote:
>>> I will not become an accomplice to this deception by giving special
>>> treatment, and will process the BIP PR neutrally according to the
>>> currently-defined BIP process.
>>
>> Again, please don't play dumb, no one watching believes this - you've been
>> active on the BIP repo on numerous PRs and this has never in the past been
>> the case.
>
> I started going through PRs a few days ago, in order of "Recently updated" on
> GitHub, starting with the least-recent following the last one I triaged a
> month ago that hasn't seen activity.. the same as I have been doing month
> after month prior to this.
>
> If you don't believe me, feel free to look through the repo history.
>
> Luke
>
|
