summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/3c/f3487bfcc92e068c7e72df7d2c710e578e7ba4
blob: 344d2f6866212294c2b6779ec5a53348bf7510d6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1Wd3th-00087g-ED
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:36:01 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Wd3tf-0000MU-NK
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:36:01 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c13so1146531eek.37
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=VmoSk2gIHTrk3+ko2MKrQoZoeHmOtgeCCqvYJw0Oa0k=;
	b=cxuXOB1pyMli1D0dWmVOaSLnnkpDjyXG0Iixdtrs8wSomgBjnKr1gFxYIUTQskvQi7
	rviByU8vh5ocIVjqUSCQwLc4EPTSeQhNDJrryqRNJP+QKwE1iuvLGec3jdlIZN1iSXPB
	Rm9fuIWw4X9rewB0SuMUiU2ij8c6Gk2EThQkGeZxB07UaMAWI3w31adD+eftNhZ5Bk4e
	//sVeHxzttzG9Z7jdsAN1gKZjrPjPMg5cpp1SkpF9avNjGSwa0jMHhAN3fo8v5qsmEJo
	oGXzhXNnBvxAmLFPani3jImw9E1xHUfWj2/0Hn8c4po7Wn1TKacGsp/ZgIOdq7pwz2VZ
	9y3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlr3gH5stzDV3m29kpMuxrPCMd7JpDtuRDtDnxJTrrfLCvPWgO5lIvouf0W+plZfGBuaXG+
X-Received: by 10.15.50.136 with SMTP id l8mr21101924eew.73.1398285353145;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x45sm9369990eef.15.2014.04.23.13.35.51
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53582426.4030601@gk2.sk>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:35:50 +0200
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CANEZrP2hbBVGqytmXR1rAcVama4ONnR586Se-Ch=dsxOzy2O4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<201404232009.08791.luke@dashjr.org> <53581FAD.5010806@gk2.sk>
	<201404232032.08740.luke@dashjr.org>
In-Reply-To: <201404232032.08740.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1Wd3tf-0000MU-NK
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:36:01 -0000

On 04/23/2014 10:32 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> f) I missed the part where BIP 32 redefined "account" to mean "subwallet" 
> instead of what has traditionally been called "account" in Bitcoin.

Ah, okay. The last time I saw Bitcoin-qt it was still using independent
addresses.

> In that case, single-subwallet wallet software probably needs to have the user 
> provide a subwallet number in addition to the seed.

Which brings us back to my original complaint that the user can be
confused because he doesn't see all his funds.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>