1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
|
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8378B94B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:46:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com
[209.85.218.54])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82B01AE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:46:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id r63so31539380oia.6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:46:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=tSKzMkjjOg6HSFlKcf+Duv68Fg9JYS/SWJcnvU8F4FU=;
b=EuOyL1ztiJIG5HhyRKQBcIe7b//4lM/Jb7+IGBsmuScnL6Q4L+feaUZyT9O/Topvhx
iKRDv6aH2CR5GfPspaXpXl3JNnzwYYHoWzRDuUGqdQvL9i//El7qAYzi1gkVXomU3uGF
J0tjDmtHANP2F0fWRonWfLDPZQCgfuQ7yuCzAYdgiKnUHaMaEoiwb4w6uvDaZvLF4ZSy
zy66hdYV9sLSCUnWW46wg+3jNE++sQL3249dWOCN3smYyGm491kXIdS9CcAJ6kmCqala
+W7Y47Ut/JOm5t985IpATQs5Da487gkk7+OQXtEpUTb4wfn7Gi+2hviFHwHIQADI3YdG
YJQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=tSKzMkjjOg6HSFlKcf+Duv68Fg9JYS/SWJcnvU8F4FU=;
b=h2aq1qkMujJcsvYlzWHMhC5aPasZ1pfzl+gso5If9XKBuahYQH6UE547AfU/VuwIr8
NGZbp/yUJ6Q5EUx1gj2ctKarjdjP74BeA7EhFIaPm/V/aAi5bjxO4uJrby/TPhl2txbF
khKjWgOrHImx+bydtegZ41EYnhyDFOpPna9TRyrH2euF2pL05Vktsdc2JcSY04547Xe6
DEZKuP4Jt/ZDbT08hjoIfGGZYRUmJg9dEG63hLUNZ3a0lWR3OZhf1CSYRifm8P/5+Y+4
BLVLHuWzQ7QGAlgx7fqzkNMU1+cXcSXPHqiuuBxmpNUsKy4LClE57d3/kDjUkj139dcF
WHMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLh2prgN9DCACzwtp1mE/G5KkNuZ4E8a7daDFRwl2+T1Tn34C9o
m/+qf8S1oNcCwpGETFKysmc85i7Xn0kjBzYW00rKPphU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBos6nqx/Rk2pJK/J+XuChGhCs8Skx1w+HZ+uUMJmvqG0syOPMbHzZBT/GG1pi9oWvNVns0v6KzmnTJx+xiT7hWs=
X-Received: by 10.202.212.83 with SMTP id l80mr29271191oig.85.1514764018111;
Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:46:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.68.67 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 15:46:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <b50376f5-1a40-1475-04be-1b6aef0bbd74@cannon-ciota.info>
References: <b50376f5-1a40-1475-04be-1b6aef0bbd74@cannon-ciota.info>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:46:57 -0600
Message-ID: <CABaSBayhm5TChEAbHboA7CLAye0nyDBqXty3bAmJ9+uC7RahMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: CANNON <cannon@cannon-ciota.info>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d210637d99e0561ab7bc1"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Single signature for all transactions in a block?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:46:59 -0000
--001a113d210637d99e0561ab7bc1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 5:39 PM, CANNON via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I had a question relating to scaling and privacy enhancements.
> I believe that segwit combined with aggregated signatures
> and coinjoin can potentially achieve such. The idea is to
> use aggregated signatures in conjunction with coinjoin. So
> that all inputs of a coinjoin transaction would have a single
> signature vastly decreasing size while having privacy at the
> same time. If majority of transactions in a block did this I
> assume that significant more transactions could be fit into a
> block?
Here are some resources to read regarding signature aggregation and
scalability:
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09-06-signature-aggregation/
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/gmaxwell-2017-08-28-deep-dive-bitcoin-core-v0.15/#signature-aggregation
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/milan/schnorr-signatures/
https://bitcoincore.org/en/2017/03/23/schnorr-signature-aggregation/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377298.0
https://bitcoincore.org/logs/2016-05-zurich-meeting-notes.html
https://github.com/sipa/secp256k1/blob/968e2f415a5e764d159ee03e95815ea11460854e/src/modules/schnorr/schnorr.md
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/2016-july-bitcoin-developers-miners-meeting/dan-boneh/
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
--001a113d210637d99e0561ab7bc1
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, Dec 31, 2017 at 5:39 PM, CANNON via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<=
a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">b=
itcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg=
b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
I had a question relating to scaling and privacy enhancements.<br>
I believe that segwit combined with aggregated signatures<br>
and coinjoin can potentially achieve such. The idea is to<br>
use aggregated signatures in conjunction with coinjoin. So<br>
that all inputs of a coinjoin transaction would have a single<br>
signature vastly decreasing size while having privacy at the<br>
same time. If majority of transactions in a block did this I<br>
assume that significant more transactions could be fit into a<br>
block?</blockquote><div><br>Here are some resources to read regarding signa=
ture aggregation and scalability:</div><div><br><a href=3D"https://diyhpl.u=
s/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09-06-signature-aggregation/"=
>https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09-06-signat=
ure-aggregation/</a><br><a href=3D"https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/gmaxw=
ell-2017-08-28-deep-dive-bitcoin-core-v0.15/#signature-aggregation">https:/=
/diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/gmaxwell-2017-08-28-deep-dive-bitcoin-core-v0.1=
5/#signature-aggregation</a><br><a href=3D"https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcrip=
ts/scalingbitcoin/milan/schnorr-signatures/">https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcr=
ipts/scalingbitcoin/milan/schnorr-signatures/</a><br><a href=3D"https://bit=
coincore.org/en/2017/03/23/schnorr-signature-aggregation/">https://bitcoinc=
ore.org/en/2017/03/23/schnorr-signature-aggregation/</a><br><a href=3D"http=
s://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D1377298.0">https://bitcointalk.org/in=
dex.php?topic=3D1377298.0</a><br><a href=3D"https://bitcoincore.org/logs/20=
16-05-zurich-meeting-notes.html">https://bitcoincore.org/logs/2016-05-zuric=
h-meeting-notes.html</a><br><a href=3D"https://github.com/sipa/secp256k1/bl=
ob/968e2f415a5e764d159ee03e95815ea11460854e/src/modules/schnorr/schnorr.md"=
>https://github.com/sipa/secp256k1/blob/968e2f415a5e764d159ee03e95815ea1146=
0854e/src/modules/schnorr/schnorr.md</a><br><a href=3D"https://diyhpl.us/wi=
ki/transcripts/2016-july-bitcoin-developers-miners-meeting/dan-boneh/">http=
s://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/2016-july-bitcoin-developers-miners-meeting/=
dan-boneh/</a></div><div><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">- B=
ryan<br><a href=3D"http://heybryan.org/" target=3D"_blank">http://heybryan.=
org/</a><br>1 512 203 0507</div>
</div></div>
--001a113d210637d99e0561ab7bc1--
|
