summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/3c/8417be53de78f18b97e7130e7ef3b8a3f998ac
blob: c2c3ab8b8d69f693e926b90b314ffcebcbbfe7f0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9CAADD0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:56:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com
	[209.85.213.49])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AD6313E
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:56:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a189so97800789vkh.2
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:56:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=zwQGFkZjNz52BM6JAF4wbDnmmAJwiw5zstKhjg9RQsk=;
	b=tfyxPz5V6zohwLBftNjFTJQ50wCQcRWSPzkv6LO1wrNVAphntjxluuegjLVfOwbpOO
	5sAC5FhuVUEF3IGSr43Jn00kVFqiWn6rbXHW8oXm2Xhh7LjAGsXIpOqgVWiX+dytTtwL
	zLr5p67E68/BtMfXmJVlo295ULyAUc2uIvQxKyfBBit7foSsuCH7Te8FXC/k+fsgMHSg
	wrnHQ995tIufIddDnkV6Ftlg790chqlBOA7mML+HME0upKeKF4ET8hUSS/Cw+F6IuCDk
	+Rqx9LEKsiYcECv5LQprR/DtcIZrPDONry5KjC2iGWWAgmdfMws6uKUq2g/vGhyKNHq+
	hm7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=zwQGFkZjNz52BM6JAF4wbDnmmAJwiw5zstKhjg9RQsk=;
	b=LaOFo0dkF9IbYOOgC0Irpvp+cWY23VDjb1+6dk+kr9Ch1FZnWlB6bZ9WvxQLscW9yF
	+MBwmkhGpNu7b43YYqxl2DwUWJCJDbQirNUDpWacaw20/aUosvIMdkfFvyl0y2/5QOKa
	+fKhIAnFkBUafLB0qdYcveLPNlCRZt1930DI4eAX9GFzSo5MA2/cueShQNeEfosiB/oR
	jccvsYbm6H1hNmM3AfJSAOeEOfUzWgvI9Y48f/hqGGmwviuB/43tvQFVMJC/DHUTDXqb
	f//Wszzzvp0Asx5Qh+15RNfUKjLnGemrHfCK6LKGDSX+62xavOS4QycsXYcXbzFGPMiY
	oN2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2aUk73UZqQQsRlUCYoh3CP8dXEPzSzDiHV6GnXnPGMlKnu0njW5F4Jquxd4Pu1zPjnH3B6hLM+t+AIRhWQ5Hpeglyvw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.154.213 with SMTP id c204mr12094552vke.38.1450691815198; 
	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.236.70 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:56:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151221080747.GA24839@sapphire.erisian.com.au>
References: <CAAS2fgQyVs1fAEj+vqp8E2=FRnqsgs7VUKqALNBHNxRMDsHdVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151208110752.GA31180@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<CAPWm=eUomq6SBC0ky0WSs5=_G942vigm4RmgYuq0O-yJ-vqC2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBig9O5+he0PWhTkX5iin14QLz5+eCCu6KfwU=DxntKYtg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBhQN2HDvH8dfq2VsQ0dTA9V=HgQsCJdP6B72fj1SDA4yw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMzuk9Q09AnmR5=77p0HfkeUWOTRSNCSkAAQN0zDq4Hsbqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151221080747.GA24839@sapphire.erisian.com.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:56:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDrhTMU7hBgYB3YF+pvCOzp2Bq4dAqJQRLB_fa8+Y9yRag@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:56:56 -0000

To clarify, although I have defended the deployment of segwit as a
hardfork, I have no strong opinion on whether to do that or do it as a
softfork first and then do a hardfork to move things out of the
coinbase to a better place.
I have a strong opinion against never doing the later hardfork though.
I would have supported segwit for Bitcoin even if it was only possible
as a hardfork, but there's a softfork version and that will hopefully
accelerate its deployment.
Since the plan seems to be to do a softfork first and a hardfork
moving the witness tree (and probably more things) outside of the
coinbase later, I support the plan for segwit deployment.
In fact, the plan is very exciting to me.