summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/3c/4d9310a8413d1516ab6011d06953cde79289fc
blob: 88c8852c0b99aec4f3bef8be5e1c896c3c680e07 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <alexy.kot.all@gmail.com>) id 1X21hP-0000Dy-7u
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:18:31 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.172 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.172; envelope-from=alexy.kot.all@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vc0-f172.google.com; 
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1X21hN-0003d7-GY
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:18:31 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hy10so9214581vcb.31
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.92.12 with SMTP id ci12mr61619vdb.90.1404235103886; Tue,
	01 Jul 2014 10:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: alexy.kot.all@gmail.com
Received: by 10.58.237.129 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.237.129 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <louknu$7ja$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <leuunm$tjk$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<CANEZrP0J849oDvMWjf8LWi0xj44Q8DaUwDip5_smVBMNgeQ3mw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALDj+BZJ0rSKuDHdbL7ANN0Vtaa3-KGYgusqMDzzB-CUxjMz7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3szn=oQS+ZuqSzjUoSAjtkyPxPWJFaU1vDW43dRNVeNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140320215208.GC88006@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<CANEZrP3kHRJ6U-O_Jgei4U6s9GyQGvB_p5ChtcHJEkYR0wWPvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140326224826.GE62995@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
	<CANEZrP2HtJsOf5zOsPz32U=Jot7U9k80yEu=hj5uMPkRC+WGsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<lgvnc2$eu4$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<CANEZrP1==hL1mW6SWV0qXUMVVx7U_HUXtorpb7qVK2R4mOfzbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<A1269E16-63BC-44D5-B460-D793D45587AD@riseup.net>
	<CALDj+BYkOyNuEiiuTgjd7L-ZeHN4Mb4034W+OeCFob1RwJn=Vg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP1HvKAg6d7tTcnY3BJr0_5LuCN1FGYQvQ1+RpL1B6cwHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<D4B82FD9-8078-48B2-9F91-8A3AB23AEAA7@osfda.org>
	<CALDj+BZ8_YB0DHiaGZPq4MB-dvkRqJhBFazcfnrrPX4EvRxbeQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<louibr$8gc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<1016E2A3-C678-46FA-B80E-F9D86FDEA213@osfda.org>
	<louknu$7ja$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 18:18:23 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3_bS-Nr26D09eZsBaUIq3zgtxsw
Message-ID: <CALDj+BZveYWed4Redvncdf=h3pEvBYosgAO3stUvhN2gxbb1UQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex Kotenko <alexykot@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071c6c68c637a04fd24f6de
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(alexy.kot.all[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1X21hN-0003d7-GY
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol for Face-to-face Payments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:18:31 -0000

--20cf3071c6c68c637a04fd24f6de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hmm, r1, r2 etc is actually interesting. It takes less chars then array
(yes, array brackets have to be escaped) and provides unlimited number of
options, uniformed approach and priority definition. I'd say that is the
way to go. Any objections?
On 1 Jul 2014 16:39, "Andreas Schildbach" <andreas@schildbach.de> wrote:

> Ok, one more idea:
> r=3D is used for the first URL, and we *think* of it as r0=3D
> additional URLs are appended as
> r1=3D
> r2=3D
> and so on. This would also define an ordering in case we need it.
>
>
> On 07/01/2014 05:07 PM, Michael Wozniak wrote:
> > Multiple parameters is currently undefined as far as I can tell.  Shoul=
d
> the client take the first, last, or ignore it completely if there are
> multiple of any parameter?  I think that=E2=80=99s the point of the param=
eter
> pollution discussion, which will define it one way or the other.
> >
> > I=E2=80=99m only familiar with the Electrum implementation, which is cu=
rrently
> checking for any duplicate parameters and treating the entire URI as
> invalid if duplicate parameters exist (following the parameter pollution
> suggestions).
> >
> > -
> > Michael Wozniak
> >
> > On Jul 1, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Does r[]=3D really need to be encoded as r%5B1%5D=3D ? In this case, I=
'd
> >> advocate for a simple array parameter name, like rs=3D ("plural" of r)=
.
> >> Length really does matter for QR codes.
> >>
> >> I'm fine with either multiple r=3D params or exactly one r=3D plus zer=
o to
> >> many r[]=3D params. Although I think it is a violation of the (current=
)
> >> spec to choke on more than one r=3D parameters, I admit that bitcoinj =
is
> >> currently implemented that way. (We could however fix this in a
> >> maintenance release.)
> >>
> >> However, r=3D should also allow all other protocols, exactly like any =
of
> >> the r[]=3D params. I don't think we should do a distinction here. Also
> >> because of backwards compatibility to the status quo.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/01/2014 03:03 PM, Alex Kotenko wrote:
> >>> In my mind it's not like the client's phone is going all directions a=
t
> >>> the same time. There should be a priority method and fallback
> method(s).
> >>> =E2=80=8BAnd I =E2=80=8Bsee p2p radio as priority, and web as fallbac=
k, and BIP21 in
> the
> >>> end as always-working-default.
> >>>
> >>> =E2=80=8BSo I'm keeping support for it all while want to be able to p=
rovide
> best
> >>> user experience.
> >>> Mike, a while ago in =E2=80=8Bthis thread you've described contactles=
s cards
> >>> user experience. I'm also using contactless cards often, and what I'm
> >>> aiming at is creating same level of user experience for Bitcoin users=
.
> >>>
> >>> Encryption over bluetooth is a matter to worry about, and we will
> >>> introduce that, but we need to sort out more low level problems first
> >>> before coming into that stage.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So, the backwards compatibility is a good issue Michael pointed out.
> >>> While processing of multiple "r" parameters is indeed uncertain (sinc=
e
> >>> there is no RFC for that various implementations may behave
> >>> differently), the array solution is somewhat better. The array
> parameter
> >>> name is "r%5B1%5D=3D", i.e. it's not "r=3D", and we can add plain "r=
=3D"
> >>> alongside. And if particular implementation understands the array
> >>> construct - it will use it, otherwise it will ignore the "r%5B1%5D=3D=
"
> and
> >>> use only usual "r=3D".
> >>>
> >>> This doens't work though for cases where particular implementation
> >>> understands array construct but doesn't work well with repeating
> >>> parameters, since it will see two repeating "r" - an array and a
> string.
> >>> I don't have a solution for that atm.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If add completely new parameter to solve this we will need to make it
> an
> >>> array straight away to address upcoming issues with accommodating oth=
er
> >>> protocols.
> >>> And then I would also modify existing BIP72 to strictly define "r=3D"=
 as
> >>> "http(s)" =E2=80=8Bonly =E2=80=8Bparameter, while all other protocols=
 (bluetooth, WiFi
> >>> Direct, ultrasound, chirp etc) should go to the new array parameter.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> =E2=80=8B
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> >>> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclip=
se
> >>> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community
> Edition
> >>> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> >>> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> >>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> >> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclips=
e
> >> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community
> Edition
> >> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> >> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> > Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> > Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community
> Edition
> > Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> > Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bitcoin-development mailing list
> > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
> Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Editi=
on
> Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
> Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--20cf3071c6c68c637a04fd24f6de
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Hmm, r1, r2 etc is actually interesting. It takes less chars=
 then array (yes, array brackets have to be escaped) and provides unlimited=
 number of options, uniformed approach and priority definition. I&#39;d say=
 that is the way to go. Any objections?</p>

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 1 Jul 2014 16:39, &quot;Andreas Schildbach&qu=
ot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:andreas@schildbach.de">andreas@schildbach.de</a>&=
gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Ok, one more idea:<br>
r=3D is used for the first URL, and we *think* of it as r0=3D<br>
additional URLs are appended as<br>
r1=3D<br>
r2=3D<br>
and so on. This would also define an ordering in case we need it.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 07/01/2014 05:07 PM, Michael Wozniak wrote:<br>
&gt; Multiple parameters is currently undefined as far as I can tell. =C2=
=A0Should the client take the first, last, or ignore it completely if there=
 are multiple of any parameter? =C2=A0I think that=E2=80=99s the point of t=
he parameter pollution discussion, which will define it one way or the othe=
r.<br>

&gt;<br>
&gt; I=E2=80=99m only familiar with the Electrum implementation, which is c=
urrently checking for any duplicate parameters and treating the entire URI =
as invalid if duplicate parameters exist (following the parameter pollution=
 suggestions).<br>

&gt;<br>
&gt; -<br>
&gt; Michael Wozniak<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Jul 1, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Andreas Schildbach &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:=
andreas@schildbach.de">andreas@schildbach.de</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Does r[]=3D really need to be encoded as r%5B1%5D=3D ? In this cas=
e, I&#39;d<br>
&gt;&gt; advocate for a simple array parameter name, like rs=3D (&quot;plur=
al&quot; of r).<br>
&gt;&gt; Length really does matter for QR codes.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; I&#39;m fine with either multiple r=3D params or exactly one r=3D =
plus zero to<br>
&gt;&gt; many r[]=3D params. Although I think it is a violation of the (cur=
rent)<br>
&gt;&gt; spec to choke on more than one r=3D parameters, I admit that bitco=
inj is<br>
&gt;&gt; currently implemented that way. (We could however fix this in a<br=
>
&gt;&gt; maintenance release.)<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; However, r=3D should also allow all other protocols, exactly like =
any of<br>
&gt;&gt; the r[]=3D params. I don&#39;t think we should do a distinction he=
re. Also<br>
&gt;&gt; because of backwards compatibility to the status quo.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; On 07/01/2014 03:03 PM, Alex Kotenko wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; In my mind it&#39;s not like the client&#39;s phone is going a=
ll directions at<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; the same time. There should be a priority method and fallback =
method(s).<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; =E2=80=8BAnd I =E2=80=8Bsee p2p radio as priority, and web as =
fallback, and BIP21 in the<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; end as always-working-default.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; =E2=80=8BSo I&#39;m keeping support for it all while want to b=
e able to provide best<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; user experience.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Mike, a while ago in =E2=80=8Bthis thread you&#39;ve described=
 contactless cards<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; user experience. I&#39;m also using contactless cards often, a=
nd what I&#39;m<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; aiming at is creating same level of user experience for Bitcoi=
n users.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Encryption over bluetooth is a matter to worry about, and we w=
ill<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; introduce that, but we need to sort out more low level problem=
s first<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; before coming into that stage.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; So, the backwards compatibility is a good issue Michael pointe=
d out.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; While processing of multiple &quot;r&quot; parameters is indee=
d uncertain (since<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; there is no RFC for that various implementations may behave<br=
>
&gt;&gt;&gt; differently), the array solution is somewhat better. The array=
 parameter<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; name is &quot;r%5B1%5D=3D&quot;, i.e. it&#39;s not &quot;r=3D&=
quot;, and we can add plain &quot;r=3D&quot;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; alongside. And if particular implementation understands the ar=
ray<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; construct - it will use it, otherwise it will ignore the &quot=
;r%5B1%5D=3D&quot; and<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; use only usual &quot;r=3D&quot;.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; This doens&#39;t work though for cases where particular implem=
entation<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; understands array construct but doesn&#39;t work well with rep=
eating<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; parameters, since it will see two repeating &quot;r&quot; - an=
 array and a string.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; I don&#39;t have a solution for that atm.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; If add completely new parameter to solve this we will need to =
make it an<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; array straight away to address upcoming issues with accommodat=
ing other<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; protocols.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; And then I would also modify existing BIP72 to strictly define=
 &quot;r=3D&quot; as<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; &quot;http(s)&quot; =E2=80=8Bonly =E2=80=8Bparameter, while al=
l other protocols (bluetooth, WiFi<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Direct, ultrasound, chirp etc) should go to the new array para=
meter.<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; =E2=80=8B<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; --------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Open source business process management suite built on Java an=
d Eclipse<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Comm=
unity Edition<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workf=
lows<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft" target=3D"_blank">h=
ttp://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft</a><br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">B=
itcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
&gt;&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoi=
n-development" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin=
fo/bitcoin-development</a><br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; ------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------<br>
&gt;&gt; Open source business process management suite built on Java and Ec=
lipse<br>
&gt;&gt; Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Communit=
y Edition<br>
&gt;&gt; Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows=
<br>
&gt;&gt; Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft" target=3D"_blank">http:=
//p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft</a><br>
&gt;&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt;&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitco=
in-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
&gt;&gt; <a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/b=
itcoin-development</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------<br>
&gt; Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclips=
e<br>
&gt; Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Ed=
ition<br>
&gt; Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows<br>
&gt; Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft" target=3D"_blank">http://p.=
sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft</a><br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-d=
evelopment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
&gt; <a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-develo=
pment" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitco=
in-development</a><br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse<br>
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition=
<br>
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows<br>
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf.ne=
t/sfu/Bonitasoft</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div>

--20cf3071c6c68c637a04fd24f6de--