1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <voisine@gmail.com>) id 1Z4lif-0005wZ-Le
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:55:41 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.220.176; envelope-from=voisine@gmail.com;
helo=mail-qk0-f176.google.com;
Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Z4lie-0002k0-Jt
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:55:41 +0000
Received: by qkbp125 with SMTP id p125so587694qkb.2
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.97.136 with SMTP id m8mr41116282qge.32.1434441335206;
Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.91.37 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a9e2e033c786fb7f99bcf7505ad45f21@riseup.net>
References: <CALqxMTHrnSS9MGgKO-5+=fVhiOOvk12Recs11S0PcSUxQT1wdQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+c4Zoy6U9RXH3Qw15sXXnaeYL-9PFbnTp=VLAJsvpC_zoAK_A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEY8wq41ftFA1ObyUWiRGOgebwqDCAw_j+hU6_wfcXv5GSZaJw@mail.gmail.com>
<201506160341.10994.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAEY8wq4SOddGUJNqkrdhhfQEn4tXehCWiifk-P=PYUdfFcXFTQ@mail.gmail.com>
<a9e2e033c786fb7f99bcf7505ad45f21@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:55:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CACq0ZD5uYikAfVuep8XCgEs-53NbF-SYhvm4qneZsEQdgd=6rw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a5d523c780d05189de6c0
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(voisine[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z4lie-0002k0-Jt
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:55:41 -0000
--001a113a5d523c780d05189de6c0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who
> would provide the nodes they would need connect to?
The SPV wallet author would if they wanted their wallet to function.
Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet.com
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:28 PM, <justusranvier@riseup.net> wrote:
> On 2015-06-16 03:49, Kevin Greene wrote:
> > =E2=80=8BHah, fair enough, there is no such thing as the "right" way to=
do
> > anything. But I still think punishing users who use SPV wallets is =E2=
=80=8Ba
> > less-than-ideal way to incentive people to run full nodes. Right now
> > SPV is
> > the best way that exists for mobile phones to participate in the
> > network in
> > a decentralized way. This proposal makes the user experience for mobile
> > wallets a little more confusing and annoying.
>
> Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who
> would provide the nodes they would need connect to? The decentralization
> fairy?
>
> There's absolutely no reason that paying for connectivity would be any
> more confusing or annoying than transaction fees are.
>
> If some full nodes in the network started offering paid connection
> slots, that would just mean that users who checked the "pay subscription
> fee" box in their wallet configuration would have an easier time
> connecting than the users who did't, just like how your transaction
> might eventually get mined without a fee but paying one makes it faster
> and more probable.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
--001a113a5d523c780d05189de6c0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">>=C2=A0<span style=3D"font-size:13px">Suppose a billion=
mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. Who</span><br style=3D"f=
ont-size:13px"><span style=3D"font-size:13px">> w</span><span class=3D""=
tabindex=3D"0" style=3D"font-size:13px"><span class=3D"">ould pro</span></=
span><span style=3D"font-size:13px">vide the nodes they would need connect =
to?=C2=A0</span><div><span style=3D"font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div><=
span style=3D"font-size:13px">The SPV wallet author would if they wanted th=
eir wallet to function.</span></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br cl=
ear=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div =
dir=3D"ltr"><div><br>Aaron Voisine</div><div>co-founder and CEO<br><a href=
=3D"http://breadwallet.com" target=3D"_blank">breadwallet.com</a></div></di=
v></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:28 PM, <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:justusranvier@riseup.net" target=3D"_blank">=
justusranvier@riseup.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left=
:1ex"><span class=3D"">On 2015-06-16 03:49, Kevin Greene wrote:<br>
> =E2=80=8BHah, fair enough, there is no such thing as the "right&q=
uot; way to do<br>
> anything. But I still think punishing users who use SPV wallets is =E2=
=80=8Ba<br>
> less-than-ideal way to incentive people to run full nodes. Right now<b=
r>
> SPV is<br>
> the best way that exists for mobile phones to participate in the<br>
> network in<br>
> a decentralized way. This proposal makes the user experience for mobil=
e<br>
> wallets a little more confusing and annoying.<br>
<br>
</span>Suppose a billion mobile phones wanted to run SPV wallets tomorrow. =
Who<br>
would provide the nodes they would need connect to? The decentralization<br=
>
fairy?<br>
<br>
There's absolutely no reason that paying for connectivity would be any<=
br>
more confusing or annoying than transaction fees are.<br>
<br>
If some full nodes in the network started offering paid connection<br>
slots, that would just mean that users who checked the "pay subscripti=
on<br>
fee" box in their wallet configuration would have an easier time<br>
connecting than the users who did't, just like how your transaction<br>
might eventually get mined without a fee but paying one makes it faster<br>
and more probable.<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/=
listinfo/bitcoin-development</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a113a5d523c780d05189de6c0--
|
