1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jtimon@monetize.io>) id 1VzO79-00053E-5i
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:05:55 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VzO77-0008No-88
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:05:55 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id z5so8655351lbh.4
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 04 Jan 2014 02:05:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=8WKWrPEJpD17NZp8fOMWCt2f99c5qommfxp9IZLPrLQ=;
b=SPxa9ujgpJ/vibZzHZfa/hFUtPklpf1aQGyLKdceANhJJhQ6Nyac3GP/LGEmvAw2L+
RRlyUVtLrH/T8/7WaSfF8uNzLEzXObzcpcXkyAHDHnzDy9XMy7nni7V63sEeoyjoOM19
Z30xVxXNFTPJ6nn9Kdp1YbZOyT9uKk5zFSYWtR8e8h4EtB27kqr/Jt64uyrpLKcxCU67
2sGjExpxsju+4rNJHRznZxcI3tWdli0wYTP4OO0N5Cm0mIiF/7hdUXPVzvYtxAAbzW1R
rGXIRyxfvDFhh4mXqEX2UE2pooc8j5bOUPR691y/QDfyoHHstSN+fw10Lp9/GpWxI7CS
s+BA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQniVy2QQ6P9IrU3G58KE6/nIwD3IzhqC4InqBjCRWVUf1fOt7yGvkCRtFeMxHL5fo0eyAFH
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.168.131 with SMTP id zw3mr133388lbb.85.1388829946478;
Sat, 04 Jan 2014 02:05:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.74.71 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 02:05:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [85.53.148.187]
In-Reply-To: <CAFVRnyr+fikViQWgM0-dEoPD4HF2OGAh3EHaYK5mEskNhZ25Ag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMkFLsSwKEiEtV1OaAsGPiU8iAWbb77fDNJDmRwbgKnZ_kjG6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20131230232225.GA10594@tilt> <201312310114.05600.luke@dashjr.org>
<op.w8x4c8vbyldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
<9aaa913f73f45db41d94d93d02eed3fa@astutium.com>
<CAFVRnyr+fikViQWgM0-dEoPD4HF2OGAh3EHaYK5mEskNhZ25Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 11:05:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC1+kJNsSdpYE6c5qM7-UjG340p_FV8p22O4OMy8f=QgxK2DMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
To: David Vorick <david.vorick@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1VzO77-0008No-88
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Merge mining
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:05:55 -0000
On 1/4/14, David Vorick <david.vorick@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you have the resources to attack one of the bigger altcoins, you
> probably have a significant investment in the cryptocurrency space, and a
> significant interest in protecting it. Compromising even something like
> dogecoin would cause a lot of questions to be raised and likely drop the
> value of bitcoin as well as all the cryptocurrencies using the same work
> function as dogecoin.
>
> Right now, there's very little benefit to attacking a significant currency,
> because it would be very expensive and likely traumatize the whole system.
> Unless it's some power like the NSA, I don't think there's much to worry
> about.
The launch thread says it clear: "very scrypt, such random, much
profit, wow, many coin".
So it seems that Dogecoin doesn't use SHA256 like Bitcoin, but scrypt
like most of the other scamcoins.
Anyway, I don't see anything in your comment in favor or against
merged mining...
|
