1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gronager@ceptacle.com>) id 1RKnaA-0000be-LF
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:51:02 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from backup-server.nordu.net ([193.10.252.66])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1RKna8-0006ZY-9r
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:51:02 +0000
Received: from [109.105.106.199] ([109.105.106.199]) (authenticated bits=0)
by backup-server.nordu.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9V8onoe024280
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:50:51 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=F8nager?= <gronager@ceptacle.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T09Eksb2=GHaNq+UQnVq5BYeaUn0Uc6SUwZ08-2H_ViGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:50:49 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <267605F1-9DEA-4870-81C3-C27E11850AD2@ceptacle.com>
References: <CANEZrP1ic4RXFzoqf66MGv=rJe3MgWxVi5nnk2VKkMc4VMCDyw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T3WKv3RLWT+Q6s7cCLzDL3sVRCWfmPiKcSp=_Re05m+zQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSYwUdiyY2XfHhWn+aN_6a72XRKs-8W7ibZM5t0tZ28rg@mail.gmail.com>
<CALf2ePy=3N1JQodP3s9PzH=Af1z-7qGdy_4=QW9-CJmaxYGz5Q@mail.gmail.com>
<7A50EE90-0FFC-45FB-A27F-786AEB23A8CA@ceptacle.com>
<CAAS2fgTx8gEztUt-UrDObMCQtfdzZc52fzS6c1q8mm+a-TjwjQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T3YnK9ogc3J39nO=Q+29daMTDhP2J_FGvpozTGAxD1z6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<1089B122-1274-454C-9097-700D392BF0FA@ceptacle.com>
<CAAS2fgQAo-xxJxVtoXbTMZ3nvQvtiFxeqOKrN5-xxppMgmBdqg@mail.gmail.com>
<564C59F8-8077-4603-8EAC-389C30509F02@ceptacle.com>
<CABsx9T09Eksb2=GHaNq+UQnVq5BYeaUn0Uc6SUwZ08-2H_ViGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1RKna8-0006ZY-9r
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Detecting OP_EVAL scriptPubKeys that are
to you
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:51:02 -0000
>=20
> How would I know that unless you told me?
At least you would have a hunch that something like that had happened as =
one of your addresses had been part of a transaction (at least in my =
setup it would pop up immediately...).
>=20
> I think the right long-term solution is moving away from bitcoin
> addresses as 'pay-to entity' and create an infrastructure where we're
> paying people or organizations.
I am not sure what you mean by this - just recall that the semi =
anonymously feature of bitcoin is one of its key features.
> But in the short term, I think there
> are lots of benefits to creating a new type of bitcoin address built
> on top of OP_EVAL that will be very easy for all of our existing
> infrastructure to support.
Still, how do you solve the end less expansions of bitcoin addresses =
that each, depending of a leading 1, 2, 3... means a quite specific =
script inside the OP_EVAL ??? Its not esthetic...
Cheers,
M
>=20
> --=20
> --
> Gavin Andresen
|
