1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1SoGWe-0002kf-O9
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:09:28 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.78])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1SoGWY-0002on-Uk for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:09:28 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
09 Jul 2012 16:09:17 -0000
Received: from [98.138.87.8] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
09 Jul 2012 16:09:17 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
09 Jul 2012 16:09:17 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 406079.64201.bm@omp1008.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 75216 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jul 2012 16:09:17 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: W.nUNAMVM1kr28Ab_JOr7v78.E9jHAT.7E9WJJGj1oox_W9
REbP1ee1AXZRt357DYafsPhp_QyC9QQA58SwObEKXn3I5.JWtT5vWytBpNdg
GvIH561jMC7_SfBRdMnHIS25wPpupkDF98oOIvWUaHofbmxeT_xwLn.zOnJY
U51z.G4GXeWwOs0TK4llBV4U746Y_KQKyU7EY1QOgdHJMqUoDxUoWG3u4Lfz
T.XSUiht66uEl0iVXzsWiiKQLAIVl5xM4XqmOEfcZjcv6D3HKta7S.ODFTLt
eVPXpQHLoRwjY9w_K0dJoIdQT5IMzNj6wGOnwQQ0ns.WCkln.aWHjvjmGoig
.ulO3HBoKaWBKB4mHOlLy0yDVFKfSVSCxUg4_8BU7zkZXJJhZz0Bob1ubzKZ
_obLkGkKyJd8XHEqLmCT2cNwq2kukbeEezzq9DUQboQwuEGog5kPvZcQMsf0
DbMIFQCMS1U1AL25ZU..RPrsSDC6qFb26jp.Ml.TMx.XBLk4GVzWxOATXIMk
TKKOTEVl5trJbhsrHY54qxDz6sxIRngtsRWAyJqLwdd7pnElMifP8NTlK7dK
EzGNaRy1MQcX54Oy6ulY_iLAMQK2LWQhqVcE-
Received: from [178.5.23.109] by web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:09:17 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233
References: <1341849295.94710.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
<CAAS2fgRd0gqrxXs4Le6nydYBaG7EO=T7FrtX6QZpg3aJtAxSvg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1341850157.18601.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRd0gqrxXs4Le6nydYBaG7EO=T7FrtX6QZpg3aJtAxSvg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [98.138.90.78 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 FSL_FREEMAIL_2
0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_1
X-Headers-End: 1SoGWY-0002on-Uk
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Random order for clients page
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:09:28 -0000
JS randomisation is bad. People shouldn't need JS to view a webpage.=0A=0AO=
nly you have a problem with this page. I don't see why Bitcoin-Qt needs to =
be first either when it dominates the front page. It is perfectly fine as i=
t is.=0A=0AYou are not a developer of any alternative clients, and this is =
a webpage for Bitcoin clients. I have made a change to remove a source of d=
isputes, and make the process more fair and equal. Your suggestion to remov=
e the clients page is your bias towards thinking that there should be only =
one Bitcoin client that everyone uses (the one which you contribute towards=
).=0A=0AIf you want to suggest removing the clients page, then fine, lets a=
lso remove all reference to Bitcoin-Qt from the front-page and turn it into=
a http://bittorrent.org/ style website.=0A=0AFact is that the other client=
s are rapidly becoming stable and mature, and the ecosystem is diversifying=
. The argument that the other clients were not up to scratch held maybe a f=
ew months ago, but not now.=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0AFrom:=
Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>=0ATo: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>=
=0ACc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" <bitcoin-development@lis=
ts.sourceforge.net>=0ASent: Monday, July 9, 2012 5:04 PM=0ASubject: Re: [Bi=
tcoin-development] Random order for clients page=0A=0AOn Mon, Jul 9, 2012 a=
t 11:54 AM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:=0A> Took me a while, but =
finally got it working.=0A> Entries on the clients page are randomly ordere=
d when the page is generated.=0A> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/co=
mmit/6850fc8c83494d6ec415ea9d36fb98366373cc03=0A> We should regenerate the =
page every 2 days. This gives fair exposure to all the clients listed.=0A=
=0AIf you had authored this as a pull request rather than making the=0Achan=
ge unilaterally I would have recommended leaving it so the=0Areference clie=
nt was always first. I also would have suggested that it=0Ause JS randomiza=
tion instead of jekyll in order to get more even=0Acoverage, though I think=
thats a more minor point.=0A=0ASome people were concerned when this page w=
as created that it would=0Ajust be a source of useless disputes.=A0 I think=
its becoming clear that=0Athis is the case. I think the cost of dealing wi=
th this page is=0Astarting to exceed the benefit it provides and we should =
probably=0Aconsider removing it.=0A
|
