1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA39BEB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:44:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qk0-f179.google.com (mail-qk0-f179.google.com
[209.85.220.179])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491051CE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:44:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r62so60992446qkf.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OsFSe0G/G9ewMgwgOGbK/2XX7Iv+7kCx7vJ6DgNtnzU=;
b=b8N6LTWhuxTqm/CQvk1uEVkOiuFBE+iZAwkGfv1QbYGh/i7UlTHotXEerAiFzAkRXD
SoUpN7bzCDfNFmbTYQAOXbqBcHX6TP/7GdAt4+Yr9DqhzHdMGrdznbkeEjy442DTnkhv
KRYMEs+RBvnxTqkNaPfOCVTEakmfH8sP9FnhNik3/GnjKcu+UvOufvrAPd14nuT43caP
mjr4ZnGGymSQFaJ+CKrS9DGK1WEYuevbOGklkq5Dxf5YJ43Ix1nwR6R8rFT9pqZ8B5Fb
0LFAAGjFiQfPnMQg6sQN0ZvvE2c7T1yDgVOa/TEDPsnqYYczMA+a1w5chsV+5zbv12rh
/lwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject
:to; bh=OsFSe0G/G9ewMgwgOGbK/2XX7Iv+7kCx7vJ6DgNtnzU=;
b=uKmpfVSjtT36rQzjKA/ZH+yBymVgJV6POSftsz4++v3s7TZxy2OY+troxslJXc6vuY
eYNZMNFmZYMZvhyFmoMWlOvea9nDgRWh0WCA1RcUmTn2reWvpA3pYpfgmoOFQUyhFncC
omLg1cmR5WiG8FuAu9mgvna0mAdS8AsJ9+c4sfsLmmoeXzMTpfwTjYbUeyLBYah4TrC5
FVb4LwJ59Q0AkT23ffHa4/Q+ogd6fWx4B2SJMBGw5iKklq3PcJwy1fgh3H34YJjv8oJQ
0Y139R1VSIF7PElJ9nbnbzmfsNDnVIDATNJDPIqyHrl78mbrFDgdWD2B6LO5+8VelMF2
JudQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxfWT/W2rqLyyTdv/e/pKhubs1CMBBStHq67eqEMJGGw0Kvxg09
M337NxuRuWej9lD2ZxXqC5UXpYcqpcMauJg=
X-Received: by 10.55.58.75 with SMTP id h72mr17597170qka.16.1497973477173;
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: earonesty@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.54.100 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:44:36 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Za7_1TzK5HuOTvm31U4AT62EO4Q
Message-ID: <CAJowKgLtu-HUDuakk4DDU53nyChbQk_zY=f5OO2j1Za95PdL7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a21aafd6dd905526620e8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:20:43 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Miners forced to run non-core code in order to get
segwit activated
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:44:38 -0000
--001a114a21aafd6dd905526620e8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Are we going to merge BIP91 or a -BIP148 option to core for inclusion in
the next release or so?
Because a large percentage of miners are indifferent, right now miners have
to choose between BIP148 and Segwit2x if they want to activate Segwit.
Should we be forcing miners to choose to run non-core code in order to
activate a popular feature?
- Erik
--001a114a21aafd6dd905526620e8
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Are we going to merge BIP91 or a -BIP148 option to core fo=
r inclusion in the next release or so? =C2=A0 <br><br>Because a large perce=
ntage of miners are indifferent, right now miners have to choose between BI=
P148 and Segwit2x if they want to activate Segwit. =C2=A0 <br><br>Should we=
be forcing miners to choose to run non-core code in order to activate a po=
pular feature?<br><br>- Erik</div>
--001a114a21aafd6dd905526620e8--
|
