summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/39/6473a5d86d0294b4c56be3fd96676b82fa2aca
blob: 20f8f4f947e0580721475f894da476e99b072cfa (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <thomas@thomaszander.se>) id 1Xefx9-0005H9-94
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:58:31 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail1.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.117])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Xefx8-0005vM-0K
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:58:31 +0000
Received: from [193.109.255.99:42877] by server-13.bemta-14.messagelabs.com id
	18/C6-19311-2E57F345; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:38:10 +0000
X-Env-Sender: thomas@thomaszander.se
X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-48.messagelabs.com!1413445089!8982266!1
X-Originating-IP: [83.145.56.68]
X-StarScan-Received: 
X-StarScan-Version: 6.12.3; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 13549 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2014 07:38:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.infront.no) (83.145.56.68)
	by server-5.tower-48.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP;
	16 Oct 2014 07:38:10 -0000
Received: from SE8EX13-MBX04.osl.infront.as (10.234.180.16) by
	SE8TMG.osl.infront.as (10.234.180.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
	id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:38:09 +0200
Received: from SE8EX13-CAS.osl.infront.as (10.234.180.10) by
	SE8EX13-MBX04.osl.infront.as (10.234.180.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server
	(TLS) id 15.0.775.38; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:38:08 +0200
Received: from debian.localnet (10.234.92.34) by SE8EX13-CAS.osl.infront.as
	(10.234.180.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.38 via
	Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:38:08 +0200
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:38:08 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-486; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; )
References: <CA+s+GJCAWXgpzyQnAar6ecKdcci+tdR8yJjCOUpB=xmj-ytZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALqxMTErVtN2bj7s=DiX4ajzMtQ=M+_DCFQ0=jT6QWUVaXwY_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0-Rnoe2GzvTs4nztbTMWKVxxuW=qMMwtcgoQJCvRkosA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0-Rnoe2GzvTs4nztbTMWKVxxuW=qMMwtcgoQJCvRkosA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <201410160938.08495.thomas@thomaszander.se>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
	lines
X-Headers-End: 1Xefx8-0005vM-0K
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:58:31 -0000

On Wednesday 15. October 2014 20.13.11 Mike Hearn wrote:
> Plus its moderation features suck, its mail archiving features suck, etc.
> It essentially has no redeeming features at all.

Other than it being open source, an open platform with no lock-in 'features' 
and it works with everyone that uses the standards properly.
Naturally, if an old version fails to function with Yahoo, I'm all for finding 
a different provider. Thats what open platforms, like Mailman, are about.

-- 
Thomas Zander