1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C0574
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149080.authsmtp.com (outmail149080.authsmtp.com
[62.13.149.80])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D86E102
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:58:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7L0wSso088858;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:58:28 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (s75-157-242-51.bc.hsia.telus.net [75.157.242.51])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7L0wKeA056510
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:58:26 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:58:20 -0700
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>
Message-ID: <20150821005820.GA27305@muck>
References: <CAED3CWgTOMFgaM6bBfU0Dn-R0NrdrhGAQo34wHEneYkTtB4Opg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEieSeSw04FYCCa-Df+V6BgJo1RHqPvJWt9t=c-JCC=dnhraWA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDp0o5DBzuoyZ=SFvnBXTwPYFWhdOqUPkP_M_3koNMVP1g@mail.gmail.com>
<55D5AA8E.7070403@bitcoins.info> <55D67017.9000106@thinlink.com>
<55D674C1.6000102@bitcoins.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55D674C1.6000102@bitcoins.info>
X-Server-Quench: bbb868a3-479f-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAMUGUATAgsB AmMbW1VeVVV7W2Q7 bA9PbABafEhKXRtv
UVdMSlVNFUssBmAB QWVLIxl3cQBHeDB2 YURiECIJDkx8fRd+
X0pTHDsbZGY1bX1N U0lQagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDSg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWx5 UwcEKFMZSEIPD3YX QBYeBzIrGUAJDw8y
MxchK1hUNkIWOUZ6 ClozVBo9Og9aIQRG dwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.157.242.51/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:58:31 -0000
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:45:53PM -0400, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev wro=
te:
You know, I've noticed you've spent a tremendous amount of time and
energy on this list promoting these kinds of metrics; obviously you're
somewhat of an expert on this compared to the rest of us.
Why don't you look into spearheading one of these analyses yourself to
show us how it's done?
> The idea is to come up with some sort of standardized metric so as
> the tools and issues come up you are comparing similar things.
>=20
> The first thing you have to do is link "centralization pressure" and
> (pressure to merge with a big miner) to some sort of overall
> decentralization metric. For instance, how much do big miners
> reduce decentralization to begin with? That is a complicated
> analysis on its own. Then you can measure specif use cases with a
> tool like that.
>=20
> the idea at least is that the metrics do not "take sides" on any
> issue and just provide a measure of whatever it is you are
> measuring.
>=20
> most of the references have to do with measuring decentralization in
> political systems so a system would need to be developed to apply to
> software projects like Bitcoin:
>=20
> http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/treisman/Papers/defin.pdf
>=20
> http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/stm103%20articles/Schneider=
_Decentralization.pdf
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=+cuS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
|
