summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/34/ba548aca6690f12ca92425de39247c963705ef
blob: 331d3dc23523398005bba03a466f41d83879b528 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pindar.wong@gmail.com>) id 1YyhQy-0001Z4-Nk
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 30 May 2015 14:08:20 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.171; envelope-from=pindar.wong@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wi0-f171.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YyhQx-0004jL-N1
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 30 May 2015 14:08:20 +0000
Received: by wivl4 with SMTP id l4so40077578wiv.1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 30 May 2015 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.195.13.1 with SMTP id eu1mr25103582wjd.131.1432994893709;
	Sat, 30 May 2015 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.156.226 with HTTP; Sat, 30 May 2015 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T0kbRe31LMwk499MQUw225f5GGd67GfhXBezHmDqxkioA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <554BE0E1.5030001@bluematt.me>
	<CAFzgq-xByQ1E_33_m3UpXQFUkGc78HKnA=7XXMshANDuTkNsvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T0kbRe31LMwk499MQUw225f5GGd67GfhXBezHmDqxkioA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 22:08:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM7BtUosinSotczf=EkZs3o0S2QV3sQKfYJzjyLnj8pRz_2-Rg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd9131a9ac74a05174d1fa1
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(pindar.wong[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YyhQx-0004jL-N1
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase Requirements
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 14:08:20 -0000

--047d7bd9131a9ac74a05174d1fa1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello. I am from F2Pool. We are currently mining the biggest blocks on
>> the network.
>
>
> Thanks for giving your opinion!
>
>
>
>> Bad miners could attack us and the network with artificial
>> big blocks.
>
>
> How?
>
> I ran some simulations, and I could not find a network topology where a
> big miner producing big blocks could cause a loss of profit to another
> miner (big or small) producing smaller blocks:
>
> http://gavinandresen.ninja/are-bigger-blocks-better-for-bigger-miners
>
> (the 0.3% advantage I DID find was for the situation where EVERYBODY was
> producing big blocks).
>
>
>> We think
>> the max block size should be increased, but must be increased
>> smoothly, 2 MB first, and then after one or two years 4 MB, then 8 MB,
>> and so on. Thanks.
>
>
> Why 2 MB ?   You said that server bandwidth is much more expensive in
> China; what would be the difference in your bandwidth costs between 2MB
> blocks and 20MB blocks?
>

Perhaps we should arrange to run some more 'simulations' with miners from
China and elsewhere?

Let me know there's interest to do.

p.

>
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

--047d7bd9131a9ac74a05174d1fa1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Gavin Andresen <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gavinandres=
en@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddi=
ng-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmai=
l_quote"><span class=3D"">On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Chun Wang <span =
dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:1240902@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">1240=
902@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st=
yle=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padd=
ing-left:1ex">Hello. I am from F2Pool. We are currently mining the biggest =
blocks on<br>
the network. </blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Thanks for giving your=
 opinion!</div><span class=3D""><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px so=
lid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Bad miners could attack us and the n=
etwork with artificial<br>
big blocks.</blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>How?</div><div><br></div=
><div>I ran some simulations, and I could not find a network topology where=
 a big miner producing big blocks could cause a loss of profit to another m=
iner (big or small) producing smaller blocks:</div><div><br></div><div><a h=
ref=3D"http://gavinandresen.ninja/are-bigger-blocks-better-for-bigger-miner=
s" target=3D"_blank">http://gavinandresen.ninja/are-bigger-blocks-better-fo=
r-bigger-miners</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>(the 0.3% advantage I DID =
find was for the situation where EVERYBODY was producing big blocks).</div>=
<span class=3D""><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding=
-left:1ex">We think<br>
the max block size should be increased, but must be increased<br>
smoothly, 2 MB first, and then after one or two years 4 MB, then 8 MB,<br>
and so on. Thanks.</blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>Why 2 MB ? =C2=A0=
 You said that server bandwidth is much more expensive in China; what would=
 be the difference in your bandwidth costs between 2MB blocks and 20MB bloc=
ks?</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><div>Perhaps we should arr=
ange to run some more &#39;simulations&#39; with miners from China and else=
where? <br><br></div><div>Let me know there&#39;s interest to do.<br></div>=
<div><br></div>p. <br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"marg=
in:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1e=
x"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><=
span class=3D""><font color=3D"#888888"><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0</div></f=
ont></span></div><span class=3D""><font color=3D"#888888">-- <br><div>--<br=
>Gavin Andresen<br></div>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>

--047d7bd9131a9ac74a05174d1fa1--